From: Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 2/3] atomic: Specify alignment for atomic_t and atomic64_t
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 18:16:43 +1000 (AEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c295a4e-4d18-a004-5db8-db2e57afc957@linux-m68k.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUgkVYyUvc85_P9TyTM5f-=mC=+X=vtCWN45EMPqF7iMg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1851 bytes --]
On Mon, 22 Sep 2025, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> This triggers a failure in kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:
>
> kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c: In function ‘bpf_res_spin_lock’:
> include/linux/compiler_types.h:572:45: error: call to
> ‘__compiletime_assert_397’ declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON
> failed: __alignof__(rqspinlock_t) != __alignof__(struct
> bpf_res_spin_lock)
> 572 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg,
> __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
> | ^
> include/linux/compiler_types.h:553:25: note: in definition of macro
> ‘__compiletime_assert’
> 553 | prefix ## suffix();
> \
> | ^~~~~~
> include/linux/compiler_types.h:572:9: note: in expansion of macro
> ‘_compiletime_assert’
> 572 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg,
> __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro
> ‘compiletime_assert’
> 39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/build_bug.h:50:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG’
> 50 | BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:695:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUILD_BUG_ON’
> 695 | BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(rqspinlock_t) !=
> __alignof__(struct bpf_res_spin_lock));
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> I haven't investigated it yet.
>
Yes, I noticed that also, after I started building with defconfigs.
I pushed a new patch to my github repo.
https://github.com/fthain/linux/tree/atomic_t
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-22 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-14 0:45 [RFC v2 0/3] Align atomic storage Finn Thain
2025-09-14 0:45 ` [RFC v2 3/3] atomic: Add alignment check to instrumented atomic operations Finn Thain
2025-09-15 8:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-15 9:38 ` Finn Thain
2025-09-15 10:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-15 10:37 ` Finn Thain
2025-09-15 11:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-09-16 0:16 ` Finn Thain
2025-09-16 10:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-09-17 1:23 ` Finn Thain
2025-09-16 12:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-09-16 21:38 ` Brad Boyer
2025-09-17 16:54 ` Andreas Schwab
2025-09-17 2:14 ` Finn Thain
2025-09-22 15:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-09-23 6:39 ` Finn Thain
2025-09-14 0:45 ` [RFC v2 1/3] documentation: Discourage alignment assumptions Finn Thain
2025-09-14 0:45 ` [RFC v2 2/3] atomic: Specify alignment for atomic_t and atomic64_t Finn Thain
2025-09-15 7:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-09-15 7:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-09-15 8:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-15 9:26 ` Finn Thain
2025-09-15 9:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-09-22 7:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-09-22 8:16 ` Finn Thain [this message]
2025-09-22 9:29 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-09-22 15:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-09-23 6:28 ` Finn Thain
2025-09-23 6:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-09-23 8:05 ` Finn Thain
2025-09-23 19:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-09-30 2:18 ` Finn Thain
2025-09-30 6:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-10-01 1:03 ` Finn Thain
2025-10-01 6:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-10-06 9:25 ` Finn Thain
2025-10-06 9:25 ` Finn Thain
2025-10-06 10:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-10-06 10:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-06 11:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-10-06 9:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-30 7:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-10-01 1:46 ` Finn Thain
2025-10-01 7:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6c295a4e-4d18-a004-5db8-db2e57afc957@linux-m68k.org \
--to=fthain@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).