From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@kernel.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Angelo Dureghello <angelo@sysam.it>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] m68k: coldfire/device.c: only build for MCF_EDMA when h/w macros are defined
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 15:40:21 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e41fed4-1eaf-607b-d43c-12f2be9c1af6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220305064036.4879-1-rdunlap@infradead.org>
On 5/3/22 16:40, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> When CONFIG_MCF_EDMA is set (due to COMPILE_TEST, not due to
> CONFIG_M5441x), coldfire/device.c has compile errors due to
> missing MCFEDMA_* symbols. In the .config file that was provided,
> CONFIG_M5206=y, not CONFIG_M5441x, so <asm/m5441xsim.h> is not
> included in coldfire/device.c.
>
> Only build the MCF_EDMA code in coldfire/device.c if the MCFEDMA_*
> hardware macros are defined.
>
> Fixes these build errors:
>
> ../arch/m68k/coldfire/device.c:512:35: error: 'MCFEDMA_BASE' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'MCFDMA_BASE1'?
> 512 | .start = MCFEDMA_BASE,
> ../arch/m68k/coldfire/device.c:513:50: error: 'MCFEDMA_SIZE' undeclared here (not in a function)
> 513 | .end = MCFEDMA_BASE + MCFEDMA_SIZE - 1,
> ../arch/m68k/coldfire/device.c:517:35: error: 'MCFEDMA_IRQ_INTR0' undeclared here (not in a function)
> 517 | .start = MCFEDMA_IRQ_INTR0,
> ../arch/m68k/coldfire/device.c:523:35: error: 'MCFEDMA_IRQ_INTR16' undeclared here (not in a function)
> 523 | .start = MCFEDMA_IRQ_INTR16,
> ../arch/m68k/coldfire/device.c:529:35: error: 'MCFEDMA_IRQ_INTR56' undeclared here (not in a function)
> 529 | .start = MCFEDMA_IRQ_INTR56,
> ../arch/m68k/coldfire/device.c:535:35: error: 'MCFEDMA_IRQ_ERR' undeclared here (not in a function)
> 535 | .start = MCFEDMA_IRQ_ERR,
>
> Fixes: d7e9d01ac292 ("m68k: add ColdFire mcf5441x eDMA platform support")
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Link: lore.kernel.org/r/202203030252.P752DK46-lkp@intel.com
> Cc: Angelo Dureghello <angelo@sysam.it>
> Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@kernel.org>
> Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
> Cc: uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
Thanks for taking care of this.
Pushed into the m68knommu git tree.
Regards
Greg
> ---
> v2: only build when the hardware macros are defined (suggested by Geert)
> v3: complete the Subject.
>
> arch/m68k/coldfire/device.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux-next-20220303.orig/arch/m68k/coldfire/device.c
> +++ linux-next-20220303/arch/m68k/coldfire/device.c
> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ static struct platform_device mcf_i2c5 =
> #endif /* MCFI2C_BASE5 */
> #endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_IMX) */
>
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MCF_EDMA)
> +#ifdef MCFEDMA_BASE
>
> static const struct dma_slave_map mcf_edma_map[] = {
> { "dreq0", "rx-tx", MCF_EDMA_FILTER_PARAM(0) },
> @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ static struct platform_device mcf_edma =
> .platform_data = &mcf_edma_data,
> }
> };
> -#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MCF_EDMA) */
> +#endif /* MCFEDMA_BASE */
>
> #ifdef MCFSDHC_BASE
> static struct mcf_esdhc_platform_data mcf_esdhc_data = {
> @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ static struct platform_device *mcf_devic
> &mcf_i2c5,
> #endif
> #endif
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MCF_EDMA)
> +#ifdef MCFEDMA_BASE
> &mcf_edma,
> #endif
> #ifdef MCFSDHC_BASE
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-07 5:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-05 6:40 [PATCH v3] m68k: coldfire/device.c: only build for MCF_EDMA when h/w macros are defined Randy Dunlap
2022-03-07 5:40 ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6e41fed4-1eaf-607b-d43c-12f2be9c1af6@kernel.org \
--to=gerg@kernel.org \
--cc=angelo@sysam.it \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gerg@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=uclinux-dev@uclinux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox