public inbox for linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
To: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
Cc: geert@linux-m68k.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/2] m68k: Handle __generic_copy_to_user faults more carefully
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 11:44:34 +1000 (AEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <77b94911-a58c-6f44-7c92-dbfdbb403bd3@linux-m68k.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef3430ab-4dbb-954b-8bc3-7abf046d134c@linux-m68k.org>


On Fri, 26 Apr 2024, I wrote:

> I will test it tomorrow. I expect that a NOP is needed at the end of 
> __clear_user.
> 

Everything seems to work now.

I tested this series together with my own RFC patch on a Quadra (68040) 
and IIci (68030). My tests covered getcwd and llseek syscalls. I tried a 
build with the extra call to __clear_user() and a build without it. And I 
covered a range of working directory names.

Tested-by: Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>

So apparently there'e no need for a NOP at the end of __clear_user() -- on 
'040 and '030 at least.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-27  1:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-22  2:29 [PATCH RFC v2 0/2] m68k uaccess fault handling fixes Michael Schmitz
2024-04-22  2:29 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/2] m68k: Handle __generic_copy_to_user faults more carefully Michael Schmitz
2024-04-25  4:16   ` Finn Thain
2024-04-25  5:32     ` Michael Schmitz
2024-04-25  6:32       ` Finn Thain
2024-04-25  7:52         ` Michael Schmitz
2024-04-25  5:45     ` Michael Schmitz
2024-04-25  6:47       ` Finn Thain
2024-04-25  7:43         ` Michael Schmitz
2024-04-25  8:20     ` Michael Schmitz
2024-04-25 19:15     ` Michael Schmitz
2024-04-26  1:00       ` Finn Thain
2024-04-26  1:22         ` Michael Schmitz
2024-04-26  7:10           ` Michael Schmitz
2024-04-26  7:57             ` Finn Thain
2024-04-26  8:31               ` Michael Schmitz
2024-04-26  7:58             ` Finn Thain
2024-04-27  1:44               ` Finn Thain [this message]
2024-04-27  4:41                 ` Michael Schmitz
2024-04-22  2:29 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/2] m68k: improve __constant_copy_to_user_asm() fault handling Michael Schmitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=77b94911-a58c-6f44-7c92-dbfdbb403bd3@linux-m68k.org \
    --to=fthain@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=schmitzmic@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox