From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mike Subject: Re: bogl: don't know screen type 1 Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 18:41:27 +0200 Message-ID: <8259f0250909030941y74b60241na319c8e4cb4f8e31@mail.gmail.com> References: <8259f0250908302028n9b0cb56td402539007736fce@mail.gmail.com> <20090831120617.GA1114@marenka.net> <8259f0250908310558l3ddd5fam7d15946a7c1e8572@mail.gmail.com> <8259f0250908311511h77270544vb2dc3dd383f1add8@mail.gmail.com> <8259f0250908311516r49e54c7fi44ead0f040cade30@mail.gmail.com> <20090901151747.GB27514@marenka.net> <8259f0250909021816g2b6a37dfs9bd91c4cabaf457a@mail.gmail.com> <8259f0250909021822k70b1a152sce6ecc651334800@mail.gmail.com> <4A9F9183.2040403@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com ([209.85.218.219]:62620 "EHLO mail-bw0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754687AbZICQlZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Sep 2009 12:41:25 -0400 Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so72687bwz.37 for ; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:41:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A9F9183.2040403@codesourcery.com> Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Maxim Kuvyrkov Cc: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, debian-68k@lists.debian.org Maxim K. Its this one, i havent tried building myslef since 2.6.28. but i dont think that was this slow http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/m68k/images/20090813-01:13/kernels/ http://aminet.net/search?query=2.6.28 Im still having trouble installing, the installer just cant seem to read the fs, even formatted a partition to ffs, which should work, and i have no /lib/modules/asfs etc. Could it be a problem with the way 3.9 has handled the harddrive? -Mike 2009/9/3 Maxim Kuvyrkov : > mike wrote: >> >> I tried to boot 2.6.29 or whatever... It was so slow compared to 2.4 i >> donno what to say, except its crap. Not a surprise if gcc produces >> crappier and crappier 68k binaries anyway. > > Would you mind submitting a bug report or two with preprocessed testcases > showing examples of bad code generation on m68k, especially if the code has > regressed since some previous version of GCC? > > Please CC me on the bug reports. > > Thanks, > > -- > Maxim K. > CodeSourcery >