From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: v3.13 panic in init_bootmem_core Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:13:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87bnz5ifsm.fsf@igel.home> References: <87sishiqmg.fsf@igel.home> <87fvohihx4.fsf@igel.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:37073 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754277AbaAUONc (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jan 2014 09:13:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87fvohihx4.fsf@igel.home> (Andreas Schwab's message of "Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:27:35 +0100") Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Linux/m68k > The size is 4089118 vs. 4135192, so still below 4M, though already > pretty close. I'd guess it just got too close to 4M to be useful. Rebuilding with CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y gives a 3530k kernel with much more leeway for the size of FastRAM. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."