From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B17320AF9A for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2025 11:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.18.0.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749295145; cv=none; b=BwAfRUbEr8UusAI5GOT9ohHtKLnLvprkQGpMDRIyVeg5z8Zi2uuzjSe8Po6w75Hp37WJJtsCrjl2meBgu+yszy1ioAYPJUdnKV690EI6j0YypXZV6R7wFPJDCTChumeRnfX9qpD+TdNIeUwfaOk2F7zNdpy4yczJutk+jh9H5lA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749295145; c=relaxed/simple; bh=84lI9mxT3sW3WIBXtGkImRAQxot+2TUHAvmeGPjrGfs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fwAgkwGz8fg+SGtF9zSsg/ZdfgiDlPOmDV3HpadbTvkvlSPdW68qZmtHEnMHVLF/VHdIBjwLzyFY50lN+KpMf7Etp6vMIhkFo3S7bY6zQC4x5hM6fqu4+9yI/adJmsEQCbRNEIJ+55y+3Z6/2i0c0kEP3rCqaGLmMkJ2AJe/1og= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nefkom.net; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.18.0.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nefkom.net Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4bDwVT3cJMz1sG7h; Sat, 7 Jun 2025 13:11:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4bDwVT145Gz1qqlW; Sat, 7 Jun 2025 13:11:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id DWaaAMi4jn0u; Sat, 7 Jun 2025 13:11:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: z1eXe/fnRfc1vLBjp5rbwWeEI4vjzrt2OpYMYSAB2aN7NBF6BfK+5Okls5So5x8T Received: from igel.home (aftr-82-135-83-135.dynamic.mnet-online.de [82.135.83.135]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 7 Jun 2025 13:11:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F22202C1929; Sat, 7 Jun 2025 13:11:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Anders Magnusson Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Finn Thain , Geert Uytterhoeven , Jean-Michel Hautbois , port-m68k , debian-68k , linux-m68k Subject: Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k In-Reply-To: (Anders Magnusson's message of "Sat, 7 Jun 2025 12:02:32 +0200") References: <442267d5-241e-44a5-9b54-fee06bc5c03b@yoseli.org> <9013836044f8bfb7f0cd62ba536f6a1c75034465.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> <80f5c684-638b-4486-9026-1f8689a7f147@yoseli.org> <95e56d983ace4976143c7e1180ffe5606c0ee3fe.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> <758f14d8-6d03-2aab-468b-170b0bbb7d2a@linux-m68k.org> <8e0186f61cc9bbed2373ae215e80ab7e70042793.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> <87sekbq3f8.fsf@linux-m68k.org> Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2025 13:11:17 +0200 Message-ID: <87ldq3ajsa.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Jun 07 2025, Anders Magnusson wrote: > The paper copy of the "System V Application Binary Interface" for 68000 > that I have here says that all pointers should be aligned 4 bytes (figure > 3-1).  Nothing else. And how is that relevant? -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."