From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32CF32AF11 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2025 16:55:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.18.0.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749315355; cv=none; b=nqINaLpuw/Dqe6bTs6EVy4RbB2wrqvMhyX2/trTgxZfdG6G2Vh0ddu/YFm8kRCEcsuaoBCCJPVPbxrrCksWED0WbSS5Z/+OmN8Eq4zOZQtwuRkyxWxv5F9SBYiyKYVvNJdmadvLLEGdaSuQtSv629LeyolNiRlCQuXJIUEvpz8M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749315355; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Z7C1JTWg9DQvvc2959NXRwdw7/41BT2gupgOk1Ql9NA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rPz1Sj2ozeOwqqwXGVjd87A3qtfy5xsyFxGpgBBSoMLSPNgD2fbiuMF3oprSIdQtN/hTEB2X3qGKkrLe2WuG608x8lDxwrDCPiAMy75UTWvW7qlkpG9zE8uUE3qqKr9m2p3ZtvyUyCh74Az4ZhpZoxFVPWXiFDm7fpeMFwgZd7M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nefkom.net; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.18.0.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nefkom.net Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4bF47n2DWgz1r56t; Sat, 7 Jun 2025 18:55:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4bF47m5Ddnz1qqlS; Sat, 7 Jun 2025 18:55:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id VNkh-tde9u6n; Sat, 7 Jun 2025 18:55:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: Ejdxt5WwV4NeyIxFslgo4+L0da1N7PXVkJoP3af9XFnPW9WD+2uoqdPW7tg/QTde Received: from igel.home (aftr-82-135-83-135.dynamic.mnet-online.de [82.135.83.135]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 7 Jun 2025 18:55:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 801212C192A; Sat, 7 Jun 2025 18:55:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: John Klos Cc: port-m68k , debian-68k , linux-m68k Subject: Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k In-Reply-To: <90e28887-5d87-b911-c4fc-8f2484bc356d@daisy.zia.io> (John Klos's message of "Sat, 7 Jun 2025 15:51:01 +0000 (UTC)") References: <9013836044f8bfb7f0cd62ba536f6a1c75034465.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> <80f5c684-638b-4486-9026-1f8689a7f147@yoseli.org> <95e56d983ace4976143c7e1180ffe5606c0ee3fe.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> <758f14d8-6d03-2aab-468b-170b0bbb7d2a@linux-m68k.org> <8e0186f61cc9bbed2373ae215e80ab7e70042793.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> <87sekbq3f8.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <2bd7d3370101b73288f9a1cd1b6eed0ba0da700e.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> <87cybfaa74.fsf@igel.home> <875xh7a91r.fsf@igel.home> <1483007ddfcb164a5b1a5ccfcc053965af1a56bd.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> <871prva88s.fsf@igel.home> <2eb555796aaa51267c0d2c88ad890b72f6684b94.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> <87tt4r8sws.fsf@igel.home> <90e28887-5d87-b911-c4fc-8f2484bc356d@daisy.zia.io> Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2025 18:55:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87plff8p9w.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Jun 07 2025, John Klos wrote: > I've suggested rolling this in to the ABI change that'll address Y2038. I > think, although you're not abundantly clear, that you advocate for that > change to not be made, too. There is no change to be made. All support for 64-bit time_t is already in place. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."