Re: RFC: remove set_fs for m68k

Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-13T05:41:36Z

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 07:12:45AM +1200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> That confirms my guess - can we rely on the call trace in that case? And
> how does overwriting kernel code at that address tee up with the kernel
> still happily chugging along?

So if you remove the WARN_ON everything keeps running just fine? I
wonder if in_interrupt somehow is not exact in m68k. Or we actually
call it from an interrupt. Let me try to unwind the various call
chains.