Re: [PATCH 08/17] ptrace/m68k: Stop open coding ptrace_report_syscall

[Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>]

Hi Geert,

Am 12.01.2022 um 20:55 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> Hi Michael,
>
>> What's the other reason these patches are still stuck, Geert? Did we
>> ever settle the dispute about what return code ought to abort a syscall
>> (in the seccomp context)?
>
> IIRC, some (self)tests were still failing?

Too true - but I don't think my way of building the testsuite was 
entirely according to the book. And I'm not sure I ran the testsuite 
with more than one of the return code options. In all honesty, I had 
been waiting for Adrian Glaubitz to test the patches with his seccomp 
library port instead of relying on the testsuite.

Still, reason enough to split off the removal of syscall_trace() from 
the seccomp stuff if it helps with Eric's patch series.

Cheers,

	Michael


>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                         Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds
>