From: Angelo Dureghello <angelo@kernel-space.org>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: gerg@linux-m68k.org, geert@linux-m68k.org,
linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com,
Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
Subject: Re: mcf5441x: flexcan FIFO and mailbox mode (was: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] can: flexcan: add mcf5441x support)
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 00:35:43 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ea16c48-b4bc-0c1-13c8-85e985ab86b1@kernel-space.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220119063837.idsiq72xrv4fvtih@pengutronix.de>
Hi Marc,
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 19.01.2022 07:25:21, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
>>> we're currently discussing the option that the user of a flexcan can
>>> switch between RX-FIFO and RX via mailboxes.
>>>
>>> I noticed that the mcf5441x currently is configured for FIFO mode. Have
>>> you tested the driver in mailbox mode?
>>>
>>> The reason that some cores use the FIFO mode is, that they cannot
>>> receive RTR CAN frames in mailbox mode. According to the IP core
>>> overview table, the mcf5441x can receive RTR frames.
>>>
>>> If the IP core supports reception of RTR frames, mailbox mode should be
>>> used, as it makes use of more buffers (16-2) instead of 6 in FIFO mode.
>>> Should we activate mailbox mode for the mcf5441x?
>>
>> Ok, not sure why i selected FIFO mode initially, my application
>> actually is quite simple. Will try the switch to mailbox, sure,
>> looking into this.
>
> Thanks for coming back to me. The mailbox mode performs better under
> heavy load, as you have more buffers available.
>
> If you're using a recent kernel, the flexcan driver has been moved to:
> | drivers/net/can/flexcan/flexcan-core.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan/flexcan-core.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan/flexcan-core.c
> index 0bff1884d5cc..aa0b7efb5ca6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/flexcan/flexcan-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/flexcan/flexcan-core.c
> @@ -296,7 +296,8 @@ static_assert(sizeof(struct flexcan_regs) == 0x4 * 18 + 0xfb8);
> static const struct flexcan_devtype_data fsl_mcf5441x_devtype_data = {
> .quirks = FLEXCAN_QUIRK_BROKEN_PERR_STATE |
> FLEXCAN_QUIRK_NR_IRQ_3 | FLEXCAN_QUIRK_NR_MB_16 |
> - FLEXCAN_QUIRK_SUPPPORT_RX_FIFO,
> + FLEXCAN_QUIRK_SUPPPORT_RX_MAILBOX |
> + FLEXCAN_QUIRK_SUPPPORT_RX_MAILBOX_RTR,
> };
>
> On older kernel with drivers/net/can/flexcan.c you need:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> index 7734229aa078..538b26619460 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> @@ -382,7 +382,8 @@ struct flexcan_priv {
>
> static const struct flexcan_devtype_data fsl_mcf5441x_devtype_data = {
> .quirks = FLEXCAN_QUIRK_BROKEN_PERR_STATE |
> - FLEXCAN_QUIRK_NR_IRQ_3 | FLEXCAN_QUIRK_NR_MB_16,
> + FLEXCAN_QUIRK_NR_IRQ_3 | FLEXCAN_QUIRK_NR_MB_16 |
> + FLEXCAN_QUIRK_USE_OFF_TIMESTAMP,
> };
>
> static const struct flexcan_devtype_data fsl_p1010_devtype_data = {
>
> Please apply appropriate change and check if the driver still works if
> you RX with full CAN bus load. Please also test if you can still receive
> RTR frames.
>
I tested this patch:
-------------------- drivers/net/can/flexcan/flexcan-core.c
index 0bff1884d5cc..daeeb6250347 100644
@@ -296,7 +296,10 @@ static_assert(sizeof(struct flexcan_regs) == 0x4 *
18 + 0xfb8);
static const struct flexcan_devtype_data fsl_mcf5441x_devtype_data = {
.quirks = FLEXCAN_QUIRK_BROKEN_PERR_STATE |
FLEXCAN_QUIRK_NR_IRQ_3 | FLEXCAN_QUIRK_NR_MB_16 |
- FLEXCAN_QUIRK_SUPPPORT_RX_FIFO,
+ FLEXCAN_QUIRK_USE_RX_MAILBOX |
+ FLEXCAN_QUIRK_SUPPPORT_RX_FIFO |
+ FLEXCAN_QUIRK_SUPPPORT_RX_MAILBOX |
+ FLEXCAN_QUIRK_SUPPPORT_RX_MAILBOX_RTR,
};
static const struct flexcan_devtype_data fsl_p1010_devtype_data = {
Bus load PC -> mcf5441x tested by
ip link set can0 type can bitrate 1000000
ip link set can0 up
cangen can0 -g 0
On target (mcf54415)
candump can0
It works, even better then FIFO mode.
While unfortunately, RTR rx does not work. Tested it by putting
a trace in flexcan_mailbox_read()
if (reg_ctrl & FLEXCAN_MB_CNT_RTR) {
printk("%s() RX RTR frame\n", __func__);
cfd->can_id |= CAN_RTR_FLAG;
}
on host pc i used:
cangen can0 -R
No sign of RTR in rx. While in FIFO mode i can see it.
> regards,
> Marc
>
Regards,
angelo
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
> Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
> Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-20 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-06 11:18 mcf5441x: flexcan FIFO and mailbox mode (was: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] can: flexcan: add mcf5441x support) Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-01-19 6:25 ` Angelo Dureghello
2022-01-19 6:38 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-01-20 23:35 ` Angelo Dureghello [this message]
2022-01-21 8:49 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-01-21 10:16 ` Angelo Dureghello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9ea16c48-b4bc-0c1-13c8-85e985ab86b1@kernel-space.org \
--to=angelo@kernel-space.org \
--cc=dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gerg@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox