From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: [RFC 1/8] m68k: coldfire: unlink FPU presence from MMU activation Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 16:20:16 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1436349092-2214-1-git-send-email-yannick.gicquel@gmail.com> <1436349092-2214-2-git-send-email-yannick.gicquel@gmail.com> <559D2FD2.5030206@westnet.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com ([209.85.214.179]:35827 "EHLO mail-ob0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758247AbbGHOUQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2015 10:20:16 -0400 Received: by obbop1 with SMTP id op1so151426500obb.2 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 07:20:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <559D2FD2.5030206@westnet.com.au> Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Greg Ungerer Cc: Yannick GICQUEL , Linux/m68k On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Greg Ungerer wrote: >>> --- a/arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu >>> +++ b/arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu >>> @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ config M54xx >>> config M547x >>> bool "MCF547x" >>> select M54xx >>> + select FPU >> >> >> ... perhaps the "select FPU" should be added to M68KCLASSIC, too, >> so we can get rid of the top one? > > > We use M68KCLASSIC for the non-MMU 68k families as well, and none > of those have FPU either. Maybe should we select FPU for each of > M68020, M68030, M68040 and M68060 in their configs? Yep, makes sense. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds