From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: [PATCH] reinstate mac rtc Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:30:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from harold.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.133.65]:54479 "EHLO harold.telenet-ops.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760573AbYJNHaf (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:30:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Finn Thain Cc: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Finn Thain wrote: > On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Any of these I should still try to get into 2.6.28? Or is queueing for > > 2.6.29 OK? > > > > Not that there's any risk in breaking non-m68k stuff, but I'm just > > feeling a bit like the bastard-maintainer-from-hell who's pointing out > > people about merge windows and such ;-) > > > > I hope to find some time soon to push the stuff queued for 2.6.28 to > > Linus... > > I don't mind. > > I guess, if you think that there is something in there that might lead to > merge conflicts later, perhaps you should send it now? I'm not that worried about merge conflicts, now we have linux-next. I don't want to rush in very recent patches. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds