From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: wire up sys_restart_syscall Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:31:08 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from nelson.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.133.66]:54760 "EHLO nelson.telenet-ops.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752069AbYL3ObL (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:31:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Schwab Cc: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Geert Uytterhoeven writes: > > > Is there an easy way to test this? > > Run 'sleep 100' and then attach to it with strace. Without this patch > the nanosleep syscall returns with an error instead of being restarted. Thanks! Applied. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds