From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k,m68knommu: merge header files Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:53:54 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <20081208205814.GA22697@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20081213205251.GC27748@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20081213205828.GD27748@uranus.ravnborg.org> <49707AE0.1040803@opengear.com> <49709800.70009@snapgear.com> <20090116143429.GB22152@uranus.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090116143429.GB22152@uranus.ravnborg.org> Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Greg Ungerer , Roman Zippel , linux-m68k , Greg Ungerer , uclinux-dev , Arnd Bergmann , linux-kbuild List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > >>More review, testing, comments welcome... > > >>Where to from here? > > > > > >I'll pull from it and give it some m68k test builds. > > >After that, you can move it to for-next. If everything's well, it can go to > > >Linus. > > > > Sounds like a plan. > > > > > > >Or should I amend and add my SoB and put it in m68k for-next? > > > > I am happy to go either way. > > For my part I like this to reach mainline ASAP. So whatever suits the > two of you is fine with me. I pulled from Greg's tree, and built atari_defconfig, multi_defconfig, sun3_defconfig. Atari_defconfig runs fine under ARAnyM. As I'll be on a business trip to Japan next week, I probably won't be able to do a proper follow-up. So Greg, can you put it on your for-next branch and send it to Linus if everything goes well? Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Thx! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds