From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Kernel versions 6.x don't boot on Amiga 4000
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 13:34:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/yVSM5Mi/Qdc2N1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2159d5c6-ee10-06e6-8085-831914ceccce@gmail.com>
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:42:34PM +1300, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi Geert,
>
> adding Mike Rapoport to the recipient list who would know whether
> memblock_reserve() relies on paging_init() having run.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
> Am 27.02.2023 um 21:26 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> > Hi Finn,
> >
> > FTR, here is the diff of the dmesg between good and bad:
> >
> > +initrd: 07f61166 - 08000000
> >
> > This is wrong (note the 6 trailing zeros), as phys_to_virt() is not
> > working correctly yet (module_fixup() is called from paging_init()).
> >
> > Zone ranges:
> > DMA [mem 0x0000000007400000-0x0000007fffffffff]
> > Normal empty
> > Movable zone start for each node
> > Early memory node ranges
> > node 0: [mem 0x0000000007400000-0x0000000007ffffff]
> > Initmem setup node 0 [mem 0x0000000007400000-0x0000000007ffffff]
> > -initrd: 00b61166 - 00c00000
> >
> > This is correct (note the 5 trailing zeros).
> >
> > -pcpu-alloc: s0 r0 d32768 u32768 alloc=1*32768
> > -pcpu-alloc: [0] 0
> > [...]
> > +Unable to handle kernel access at virtual address (ptrval)
> > +Oops: 00000000
> > +Modules linked in:
> > +PC: [<002c11be>] memcmp+0x2c/0x5c
> > +SR: 2700 SP: (ptrval) a2: 003bd560
> > +d0: 0035eb83 d1: 07fffff8 d2: 002c1192 d3: 000000e6
> > +d4: 000684e8 d5: 00447000 a0: 0000000c a1: 07fffff4
> > +Process swapper (pid: 0, task=(ptrval))
> > +Frame format=7 eff addr=003bbfbc ssw=0505 faddr=07fffff4
> > +wb 1 stat/addr/data: 0005 00447000 07401000
> > +wb 2 stat/addr/data: 0005 000000e6 000684e8
> > +wb 3 stat/addr/data: 0005 003bbfb4 002c1192
> > +push data: 07401000 002c7d82 07401000 074a2cf4
> > +Stack from 003bbfb4:
> > +002c1192 000000e6 002c7d82 00428eda 07fffff4 0035eb7f 0000000c 00447000
> > +000000e6 000684e8 00447000 07401000 074bec08 07401000 074a2cf4 07fffff0
> > +00440406 00000000 00428322
> > +Call Trace: [<002c1192>] memcmp+0x0/0x5c
> > +[<002c7d82>] _printk+0x0/0x18
> > +[<00428eda>] start_kernel+0x80/0x5b0
> > +[<000684e8>] pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x3b4
> > +[<00428322>] _sinittext+0x322/0x9b0
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 7:30 AM Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 27 Feb 2023, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > > I wonder whether Finn's memtest patch merely exposed another MM bug
> > >
> > > A kernel patch may be easier than a bootloader patch (even if this is a
> > > bootloader bug) particularly if it affects multiple platforms.
> > >
> > > A partial revert of my patch (below) will probably avoid the issue, but
> > > with the side effect that use of memtest will clobber the initrd.
> >
> > Which we can avoid, by moving the ramdisk handling inside paging_init().
> >
> > > The initrd and memtest features aren't usually needed together. At the
> > > time when I needed the memtest feature I did not have confidence in the
> > > hardeare. An initrd wasn't very useful at that point.
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_mm.c b/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_mm.c
> > > index 3a2bb2e8fdad..92f1b9268dff 100644
> > > --- a/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_mm.c
> > > +++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_mm.c
> > > @@ -326,6 +326,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> > > panic("No configuration setup");
> > > }
> > >
> > > + paging_init();
> > > +
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD
> > > if (m68k_ramdisk.size) {
> > > memblock_reserve(m68k_ramdisk.addr, m68k_ramdisk.size);
> >
> > Presumably something in memblock_reserve() relies on having
> > called paging_init() before?
memblock_reserve() does not rely on paging_init() as it operates on
physical addresses and it does not care if memory was already registered.
What does rely on paging_init() it's phys_to_virt() in the line after
memblock_reserve():
initrd_start = (unsigned long)phys_to_virt(m68k_ramdisk.addr);
initrd_end = initrd_start + m68k_ramdisk.size;
So to have both memtest and initrd we'd need something like
memblock_reserve(m68k_ramdisk.addr, m68k_ramdisk.size);
paging_init() {
/* setup page tables and memblock */
early_memtest();
}
initrd_start = (unsigned long)phys_to_virt(m68k_ramdisk.addr);
or
paging_init(); /* without early_memtest() */
memblock_reserve(m68k_ramdisk.addr, m68k_ramdisk.size);
initrd_start = (unsigned long)phys_to_virt(m68k_ramdisk.addr);
early_memtest();
> > I'll do some more debugging later today...
> >
> > > @@ -335,8 +337,6 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> > > }
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > - paging_init();
> > > -
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_NATFEAT
> > > nf_init();
> > > #endif
> > >
> >
> >
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-27 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-21 14:50 Kernel versions 6.x don't boot on Amiga 4000 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-02-21 14:55 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-02-21 15:53 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-02-21 21:09 ` Michael Schmitz
2023-02-21 21:46 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-02-22 0:53 ` Michael Schmitz
2023-02-23 18:24 ` Michael Schmitz
2023-02-26 11:02 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-02-26 12:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-02-27 2:01 ` Michael Schmitz
2023-02-27 5:55 ` Finn Thain
2023-02-27 7:19 ` Michael Schmitz
2023-02-27 9:41 ` Eero Tamminen
2023-02-27 9:52 ` Michael Schmitz
2023-02-27 2:09 ` Michael Schmitz
2023-02-27 6:33 ` Finn Thain
2023-02-27 8:01 ` Finn Thain
2023-02-27 8:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-02-27 9:42 ` Michael Schmitz
2023-02-27 11:34 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2023-02-27 12:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-02-27 12:40 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y/yVSM5Mi/Qdc2N1@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=debian-68k@lists.debian.org \
--cc=fthain@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=schmitzmic@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox