Re: U-Boot support for M68K removal

Tom Rini
2023-01-30T19:32:54Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1457 bytes --]

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 08:22:15PM +0100, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> thanks a lot, and thanks Geert for forwarding this :)
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 5:14 PM Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 01:49:11PM +0100, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Tom and all,
> > >
> > > really have to apologize, had hard times these last 2 years
> > > and couldn't follow at all the activity, i am totally culprit
> > > and responsible.
> > >
> > > Now i can jump back on following, if there is any sense
> > > in keeping m68k/coldfire.
> > > Let me know, if ok i start back checking all old patches
> > > from tonight. Also, will have to update my email and rebase
> > > to master.
> >
> > I'm glad you're back. I think the first thing to do would be to confirm
> > that U-Boot still works on at least some supported board, then
> > confirming you can still access
> > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-coldfire
> >
> first 2 tests:
>
> 1) rebased u-boot to master, flashed to stmark2 (mcf54415),
> no boot, black console. Working on this.

OK. Based on some other reports in general, I suspect there's probably
2 or 3 different bugs uncovered / introduced. Hopefully it's not too
hard to flash and test so bisect'ing these down won't be super painful.

> 2) seems i can still access
> https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-coldfire

Great!

--
Tom

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]