From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-m68k-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9752C433FE
	for <linux-m68k@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 18:59:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1357468AbiDSTCQ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-m68k@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 19 Apr 2022 15:02:16 -0400
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47362 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1357446AbiDSTCJ (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>);
        Tue, 19 Apr 2022 15:02:09 -0400
Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [5.9.137.197])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51F353F32C
        for <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 11:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ea971b5839329c23fffea6a903.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ea:971b:5839:329c:23ff:fea6:a903])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id DA1CB1EC0535;
        Tue, 19 Apr 2022 20:59:19 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim;
        t=1650394759;
        h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
         to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
         content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:  references:references;
        bh=yrDZi8RMHpoQYGjBhUR4MquierfF40OlMH05yPCr678=;
        b=NPvKM/Wy8mQo++H2OW7Voa1icNv7WJbylKqcGbmX9/8e2j/yCYoiJqcJ0+5o9B005Mpzj/
        TD+yw6C+vRnnfSqzgCvjEYc+SWyUsoaK+QzztzQGEAAJVJC2oEMbsbx74N6rtA0u15QPpf
        KNmXSR9VCSZUViMcCDgEmNh/kg8/la0=
Date:   Tue, 19 Apr 2022 20:59:16 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
        Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
        "open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
        sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-um@lists.infradead.org, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/11] x86: use fallback for random_get_entropy()
 instead of zero
Message-ID: <Yl8GhNjwPLNiUfSZ@zn.tnic>
References: <20220419111650.1582274-1-Jason@zx2c4.com>
 <20220419111650.1582274-8-Jason@zx2c4.com>
 <Yl78gLLcSb3EHv0B@zn.tnic>
 <CAHmME9q03Je-ROzzHCgZC0vy1n=y8bsGBOAs8U_K_r3ebLNHbw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9q03Je-ROzzHCgZC0vy1n=y8bsGBOAs8U_K_r3ebLNHbw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-m68k.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 08:38:41PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> I think I prefer doing (a), and leaving (b) for another time when you
> or another x86 maintainer can do so. But I'll do whichever you say.
> Which would you like?

We are switching all feature checks to cpu_feature_enabled() so you
might as well do the new preferred way of checking when adding a
new function and so that we have one less place to touch. Which is
appreciated. :)

Thx!

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette