From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56B631C282 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="UWH2dHaa"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="4V4gpIFY"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="bxvUgOrz"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="QyFt7WxI" Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6656A1F797; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 08:05:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1704269112; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WGcbw3rvTR2Ld6aqvwwzw+7Jf0vakMAAY1hsseRN4hI=; b=UWH2dHaae2YV2l+ISYddx5ia8KxFgTnOBVikH1ttJWZZRv3k1Pmcnh3rMSBAegH+92XNs3 XAhm7JnAD2OXtUupeZrq1R2m7yWl/s4qNPlZ1H1bYGzFwZmmbGxRABC5K7naQhzlFcEziZ Ph3GUFfHb3kFCrxDceiHFSBw935lPjw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1704269112; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WGcbw3rvTR2Ld6aqvwwzw+7Jf0vakMAAY1hsseRN4hI=; b=4V4gpIFY+OAi9OzMAaSqyvqyhEotHnRZLzFlYo1Gk9qei84qhxPPwhj3UualCNHyxWNAvr fkdYkgGqJtX82bCw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1704269111; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WGcbw3rvTR2Ld6aqvwwzw+7Jf0vakMAAY1hsseRN4hI=; b=bxvUgOrzHpYruhYJ6lZuhoF76D4f/p+eps1jJZP/iVXIlNHK+Vka0ln7fbMUmrC7XHM2aH zwgQNWsIDs/Ucs+21mFIrhMOQWOOxckNAVGleiKpyJPsw8PIHzndBzc1Wmrk6u2GW76/AK fuWzJoTrF7YURG4FC0lPfinUVbGT/TM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1704269111; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WGcbw3rvTR2Ld6aqvwwzw+7Jf0vakMAAY1hsseRN4hI=; b=QyFt7WxICJF3AmaC4vPpBjw3AJRbpxu01LHc9JaVXfqSY7YBCbfqQYrX/OQ/lp4xOTtHzd V9/kf7AeZ3TG8ABA== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53CCD1340C; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 08:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id Z3FbEzcVlWUrWAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Wed, 03 Jan 2024 08:05:11 +0000 Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 09:04:26 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Petr Vorel Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Christophe Lyon , Randy Dunlap , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Greg Ungerer , ltp@lists.linux.it Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 00/36] Remove UCLINUX from LTP Message-ID: References: <20240103015240.1065284-1-pvorel@suse.cz> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Level: Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Score: -0.88 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.88 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[10]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:email]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-0.08)[63.86%] X-Spam-Flag: NO Hi! > > UCLINUX is broken in LTP and nobody really cares. Actually I dare to > > say UCLINUX is dead. Therefore I prepared patchset to remove UCLINUX > > from LTP. We have been actively removing UCLINUX from LTP during rewrite > > tests to new LTP API. This removes the rest from the old tests (which > > will be sooner or later rewritten to new API). > > > > Because the patchset is quite big, I did not want to send it to mailing > > lists (but I can do it if you want). > > I agree that this should be done, but I'm not sure if we want to get > this in before the January release. I guess that such change would be > safer to merge just after the release so that we have a few months to > actually catch possible problems. Looking at the actuall changes it does not look awfuly complex, so maybe we can try to merge it before the pre-release testing and hopefully things will not break badly. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz