From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] m68k: Define NR_CPUS
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 09:33:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa23abe3-7236-4b9e-b237-3b822ac9d186@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240923235617.1584056-1-linux@roeck-us.net>
On 24.09.24 01:56, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS depends on "NR_CPUS >= 4". Unfortunately, that evaluates
> to true if there is no NR_CPUS configuration option. This results in
> CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS=y for mac_defconfig. This in turn causes the m68k
> "q800" and "virt" machines to crash in qemu if debugging options are
> enabled.
>
> Making CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS dependent on the existence of NR_CPUS
> does not work since a dependency on the existence of a numeric Kconfig
> entry always evaluates to false. Example:
>
> config HAVE_NO_NR_CPUS
> def_bool y
> depends on !NR_CPUS
>
> After adding this to a Kconfig file, "make defconfig" includes:
> $ grep NR_CPUS .config
> CONFIG_NR_CPUS=64
> CONFIG_HAVE_NO_NR_CPUS=y
>
> Define NR_CPUS for m68k instead to solve the problem.
>
> Fixes: 394290cba966 ("mm: turn USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS / USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS into Kconfig options")
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
> v2: Instead of trying to make SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS depend on the
> existence of NR_CPUS, define NR_CPUS for m68k.
Okay, looks like we're cleaning up CONFIG_NR_CPUS for good.
I'm back from conference travel tomorrow; I'll then throw in the following
into cross compilers and fixup any other arch that needs attention:
diff --git a/include/linux/threads.h b/include/linux/threads.h
index 1674a471b0b4..e31715e6746b 100644
--- a/include/linux/threads.h
+++ b/include/linux/threads.h
@@ -13,8 +13,7 @@
* bit of memory. Use nr_cpu_ids instead of this except for static bitmaps.
*/
#ifndef CONFIG_NR_CPUS
-/* FIXME: This should be fixed in the arch's Kconfig */
-#define CONFIG_NR_CPUS 1
+#error "CONFIG_NR_CPUS not defined"
#endif
/* Places which use this should consider cpumask_var_t. */
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-24 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-23 23:56 [PATCH v2] m68k: Define NR_CPUS Guenter Roeck
2024-09-24 7:33 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-09-24 7:48 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-09-24 8:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-24 9:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-24 14:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-09-24 14:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-24 19:23 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2024-09-24 7:47 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-09-24 14:09 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aa23abe3-7236-4b9e-b237-3b822ac9d186@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox