From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: merge of m68knommu and m68k arch branches? Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:18:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <4D5DB83D.80205@snapgear.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4D5DB83D.80205@snapgear.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Greg Ungerer Cc: Linux/m68k , Linux Kernel Development , Steven King , uClinux development list , Greg Ungerer , Greg Ungerer List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 18 Feb 2011, Greg Ungerer wrote: > Inside of the new arch/m68k is a little messy in the kernel and mm > directories. There is plenty of scope for cleanup and merge on the > files in here - but I want to leave that for follow up patches after > this initial directory merge. As a data point, when we merged the > m68k and m68knommu include files we had something like 70 or 80 > duplicate but separate files, after some cleanups that is now down to > 10. Ongoing cleanup will merge some of these remaining ones as well. > > Thoughts? Hmm, how are you going to deal with the fact, that m68knommu uses genirq, m68k not? I guess there are some more points like this (clockevents, clocksource ...) Is there a plan to move m68k to the generic facilities as well ? Thanks, tglx