From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Finn Thain Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/36] mac_scsi: Cleanup PDMA code Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 18:18:53 +1100 (AEDT) Message-ID: References: <20141027052607.105914311@telegraphics.com.au> <20141027052611.955142205@telegraphics.com.au> <5451ECC1.9030103@suse.de> <5451FA96.4050901@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from kvm5.telegraphics.com.au ([98.124.60.144]:56431 "EHLO kvm5.telegraphics.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760826AbaJaHT5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2014 03:19:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5451FA96.4050901@suse.de> Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" , Michael Schmitz , Sam Creasey , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 10/30/2014 08:46 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > > Any reason why you didn't re-indent [...] > Ahh, forget it. > > Addressed with the next patch. > So, does it get your reviewed-by tag? (Thanks for reviewing all this, BTW.) You also questioned mac_scsi.c whitespace in your review of, "[PATCH v2 14/36] ncr5380: Remove pointless compiler command line override macros." By the end of this patch series, I thought that mac_scsi.c was in pretty good shape (?) --