From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
To: Angelo Dureghello <angelo@sysam.it>
Cc: Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: coldfire uart question
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:08:53 +1100 (AEDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1710160943040.3@nippy.intranet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1f18ad0d-d147-5c64-ad65-a4bc545d4bff@sysam.it>
On Sun, 15 Oct 2017, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i was trying a file transfer with xmodem-1k and uClinux "rx" on the
> mcf54415 stnmark2 board side.
>
> This using a recent mainline kernel:
> / # cat /proc/version
> uClinux version 4.14.0-rc4stmark2-001-00118-g811fdbb62a9d
> / #
>
> So, as per xmodem-1k, i send 3 bytes header, a 1024 bytes block, and 2
> bytes crc16. But "rx" timeouts waiting the block.
>
What is the fastest baud rate that will work?
> Adding some traces to "rx", it timeouts since some bytes (5 to 10)
> randomly positioned in the block are not received. Of course they have
> been sent (scope checked).
>
> The same 1024 bytes transfer in u-boot (y-modem) always succeed.
>
Does u-boot need to do any retransmissions? (If it polls the UART, it
could probably avoid any fifo overflow.)
You may also want to try lrzsz.
> Since mcf54415 has a 4 slots RX fifo UART,
Ouch. At 115200 baud, that FIFO overflows after about 347 microseconds. If
the kernel takes one interrupt per 4 bytes, you're looking at thousands of
interrupts per second. Add a little unexpected interrupt latency (say, 50
microseconds) and the next byte gets lost.
--
> i was wondering if the mcf.c uart driver is not fast enough to read the
> data, or, where the "linux" limitation could be.
>
> Regards,
> Angelo Dureghello
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-15 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-15 17:28 coldfire uart question Angelo Dureghello
2017-10-15 23:08 ` Finn Thain [this message]
2017-10-17 21:18 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-10-18 0:06 ` Finn Thain
2017-10-18 6:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-10-18 7:05 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-10-18 8:15 ` Finn Thain
2017-10-18 7:12 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-10-18 7:19 ` Angelo Dureghello
2017-10-18 7:35 ` Philippe De Muyter
2017-10-15 23:57 ` Greg Ungerer
2017-10-17 21:07 ` Angelo Dureghello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.00.1710160943040.3@nippy.intranet \
--to=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
--cc=angelo@sysam.it \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox