From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Finn Thain Subject: Re: m68k, signals and single-stepping Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 21:57:42 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: References: <20100930055823.GK19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20100930120504.GM19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20100930165041.GN19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from www.telegraphics.com.au ([204.15.192.19]:38166 "EHLO mail.telegraphics.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754002Ab0JBL5r (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Oct 2010 07:57:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Schwab Cc: Al Viro , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux/m68k On Sat, 2 Oct 2010, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Finn Thain writes: > > > What are the userland pre-requisites for this kind of testing? > > The best way to test it is to run the gdb testsuite and look for > regressions. That sounds convenient enough. What test failures might one expect for recent kernel, tools and libc? (Other than failures due to race conditions Al mentioned.) Finn > > Andreas. > >