From: Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: [RFC v3 3/5] atomic: Specify alignment for atomic_t and atomic64_t
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2025 09:19:20 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d5a0121eb3c9dc3645488d24a2f71aa55582e75f.1759875560.git.fthain@linux-m68k.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1759875560.git.fthain@linux-m68k.org>
Some recent commits incorrectly assumed 4-byte alignment of locks.
That assumption fails on Linux/m68k (and, interestingly, would have
failed on Linux/cris also). Specify the minimum alignment of atomic
variables for fewer surprises and (hopefully) better performance.
On an m68k system with 14 MB of RAM, this patch reduces the available
memory by a couple of percent. On a 64 MB system, the cost is under 1%
but still significant. I don't know whether there is sufficient
performance gain to justify the memory cost; it still has to be measured.
Cc: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMuHMdW7Ab13DdGs2acMQcix5ObJK0O2dG_Fxzr8_g58Rc1_0g@mail.gmail.com/
---
Changed since v2:
- Specify natural alignment for atomic64_t.
Changed since v1:
- atomic64_t now gets an __aligned attribute too.
- The 'Fixes' tag has been dropped because Lance sent a different fix
for commit e711faaafbe5 ("hung_task: replace blocker_mutex with encoded
blocker") that's suitable for -stable.
---
include/asm-generic/atomic64.h | 2 +-
include/linux/types.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/atomic64.h b/include/asm-generic/atomic64.h
index 100d24b02e52..f22ccfc0df98 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/atomic64.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/atomic64.h
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/types.h>
typedef struct {
- s64 counter;
+ s64 __aligned(sizeof(s64)) counter;
} atomic64_t;
#define ATOMIC64_INIT(i) { (i) }
diff --git a/include/linux/types.h b/include/linux/types.h
index 6dfdb8e8e4c3..a225a518c2c3 100644
--- a/include/linux/types.h
+++ b/include/linux/types.h
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ typedef phys_addr_t resource_size_t;
typedef unsigned long irq_hw_number_t;
typedef struct {
- int counter;
+ int __aligned(sizeof(int)) counter;
} atomic_t;
#define ATOMIC_INIT(i) { (i) }
--
2.49.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-07 23:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-07 22:19 [RFC v3 0/5] Align atomic storage Finn Thain
2025-10-07 22:19 ` [RFC v3 4/5] atomic: Add alignment check to instrumented atomic operations Finn Thain
2025-10-07 22:19 ` [RFC v3 1/5] documentation: Discourage alignment assumptions Finn Thain
2025-10-14 10:23 ` David Laight
2025-10-15 7:40 ` Finn Thain
2025-10-15 13:53 ` David Laight
2025-10-16 6:53 ` Finn Thain
2025-10-16 13:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-10-16 22:14 ` Finn Thain
2025-10-07 22:19 ` Finn Thain [this message]
2025-10-07 22:19 ` [RFC v3 5/5] atomic: Add option for weaker alignment check Finn Thain
2025-10-07 22:19 ` [RFC v3 2/5] bpf: Explicitly align bpf_res_spin_lock Finn Thain
2025-10-09 2:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-09 2:56 ` Finn Thain
2025-10-09 7:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-09 15:17 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-09 16:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-10-09 16:12 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d5a0121eb3c9dc3645488d24a2f71aa55582e75f.1759875560.git.fthain@linux-m68k.org \
--to=fthain@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).