From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: m68k, signals and single-stepping Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:27:44 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20100930055823.GK19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20100930120504.GM19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20100930165041.GN19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:35251 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754589Ab0JBM1q (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Oct 2010 08:27:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Finn Thain's message of "Sat, 2 Oct 2010 21:57:42 +1000 (EST)") Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Finn Thain Cc: Al Viro , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux/m68k Finn Thain writes: > That sounds convenient enough. What test failures might one expect for > recent kernel, tools and libc? You'll need to compare the runs before and after any patching. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."