From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: fix find_next bitops Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:09:52 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1301050810-11329-1-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:40632 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755053Ab1C3UJz (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:09:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Geert Uytterhoeven's message of "Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:02:50 +0200") Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Akinobu Mita , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Roman Zippel , linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, Michael Schmitz Geert Uytterhoeven writes: > Andreas, do you think it's worth keeping (and fixing) the m68k "optimized" > versions? Should be easy to add the required offset >= size checks. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."