From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: Interrupt issue on m68k platform and some fix
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:05:59 +0200
Message-ID: <m38wj7tpxk.fsf@hase.home>
References: <4A4C3267.2040705@freescale.com> <m3hbxvtruk.fsf@hase.home>
	<4A4C76CB.4000208@freescale.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:39899 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751059AbZGBJIZ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 2 Jul 2009 05:08:25 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4A4C76CB.4000208@freescale.com> (Lanttor's message of "Thu, 02
	Jul 2009 16:58:51 +0800")
Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org
To: Lanttor <lanttor.guo@freescale.com>
Cc: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, uClinux development list <uclinux-dev@uclinux.org>

Lanttor <lanttor.guo@freescale.com> writes:

> So this code sets value 1 to the second byte of preempt_count field.

No.  Byte would be addqb.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."