From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=172.234.252.31 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793718078; b=jjQ61t6Ak0A0OhZstGYFJCKJkz/G04hkVSNfAuL6jF7KMIQSiXDITHF2z4B79K2MhhNr YXbSukalCnSHNvsODBy9JRPJPFXAZum/9h1w8iwW+Fy8p1HuouivapfJYCzKJNgVRKOws kye834Q08db3YGWrF/Ff+oZk4K7FIiTz51lNuJTsytb99VTrRBYLYDW3LueksEVu7NdTh j2gNrW2xJcwSQiOxHrJj1gJdG/7d87cou7pjCFwYda9xPJRUAm9LHcXnk4vh9/ffN/5vi QWFuOMmJ2ih6ZckckFqmORO1O7LKqLJcujFs/qYsNT03EjBesvzC20wT8m3sZ95simg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793718078; h=DMARC-Filter:Received:Received:DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:From: Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date; bh=LtZqKTI362maYNzVac7eehRAzsprmajrL5qhala3VHA=; b=OywqxqmuC222IpJxC+V8/zSDizfD9pD95RiW7S3VhugTrkPY6K6RkzedVLUjIBSRy8Lk a6JGq4wQD0qaluvK16EpdbGS2ycemj8P6k9/98ZrmL32w2sR5yYPZJTYKhx2BfE+9dyNy yQqdPN7Ij7uVFpG5D/H8gk2yarVEVYynnNIVhWbME70Q/+DfLD//XRK2zqvcYdjOIARcF 7u+C70zKDzDl7n1/CnDWf0rJJ1WPJF2ahqBDG/5f3upufnQvfg+kQqjlMPUgIKAKlIzzO nAbYWDGEpkRPDku/DYxeP0goyXKGMGZj4bVKAunhMQ5Q2vt3tiR1peXcyWqtGHMmUIQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=eXQpWkc3; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=172.234.252.31 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org (sea.source.kernel.org [172.234.252.31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93E28606A7B5 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 15:01:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 93E28606A7B5 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=eXQpWkc3 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60BB4432BA; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 15:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B55DF1F00A18; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 15:01:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793718077; bh=LtZqKTI362maYNzVac7eehRAzsprmajrL5qhala3VHA=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=eXQpWkc3uOcqQ5JnVG8GDwDONMut840YqiKHt70+ZChrT9F/gAuTzrJ1MgF+EtTiI pIHnFVjjMPCDE4zUdFv+KrsHUA+gcjSot3YPwOmRUGnBpAxlYE54E4N3J6Y7uuyugZ +n59+5WkWJ15XUosDXPVIaRrh1gNIRU9QWFK1gVFuit7QU1S9OQHEsu0qNCk4nqsd6 0O4K8YNuO6zhFE7kHEwN6K8N/CGGW619TSA/cOokl6UTRnf7OmZioRbUlPVGsC7EcF v8E8ffn9nYk0ynAGCilOHRhHf4IJen3hNNMOl3BDkuvr7hr4jJt1eND9Pac/6Y2uUb Iuhk8b32INjKQ== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 07/16] treewide: let procfs own the seq_file of simple proc entries Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Christian Brauner" Cc: "Linus Torvalds" , "Jann Horn" , "Josef Bacik" , "Chris Mason" , "Jeff Layton" , NeilBrown , "Eric Dumazet" , "Thomas Gleixner" , "Al Viro" , "Jonathan Corbet" , "Christoph Hellwig" , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , "Joel Granados" , "Kees Cook" , "Jan Kara" , "Jan Kara" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, "Takashi Iwai" , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Chuck Lever" , tytso@mit.edu, "Heiko Carstens" , "Vasily Gorbik" , "Alexander Gordeev" , "Christian Borntraeger" In-Reply-To: <20261102-work-procfs-core-v1-7-75df35e4f8b8@kernel.org> References: <20261102-work-procfs-core-v1-0-75df35e4f8b8@kernel.org> <20261102-work-procfs-core-v1-7-75df35e4f8b8@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2026 15:01:15 +0000 X-Mailing-List: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list > Most proc entries that bring their own struct proc_ops only call > single_open(), seq_open() or seq_open_private() in ->proc_open() and > free the seq_file with the matching helper. Declare the show function > or the seq_operations instead and let procfs open and free the > seq_file. Reading these files then no longer holds up their removal. >=20 > Done with the following semantic patch. The new initializers were > aligned like their neighbours afterwards: >=20 > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > /// Let procfs open the seq_file of proc entries whose ->proc_open() on= ly > /// calls single_open(), seq_open() or seq_open_private(). > // > // Confidence: High > // Options: --no-includes --include-headers > [ ... ] > identifier open_fn =3D {single.open_fn, seq.open_fn, priv.open_fn}; > @@ > - static int open_fn(...) { ... } >=20 > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261102-work-procf= s-core-v1-0-75df35e4f8b8@kernel.org?part=3D7