public inbox for linux-man@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott James Remnant <scott-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Matt Helsley <matthltc-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton
	<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Sukadev <sukadev-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Containers
	<containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>,
	Michael Kerrisk
	<mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc connector: add event for process becoming session leader
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:38:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1246019931.10001.7.camel@quest> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090623210110.GB7931-52DBMbEzqgQ/wnmkkaCWp/UQ3DHhIser@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1893 bytes --]

On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 14:01 -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 04:19:09PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > +	get_seq(&msg->seq, &ev->cpu);
> > > +	ktime_get_ts(&ts); /* get high res monotonic timestamp */
> > > +	put_unaligned(timespec_to_ns(&ts), (__u64 *)&ev->timestamp_ns);
> > > +	ev->what = PROC_EVENT_SID;
> > > +	ev->event_data.sid.process_pid = task->pid;
> > 
> > This is a bit of a worry.  In a containerised environment, pids are not
> > unique.  Now what do we do?
> 
> An excellent point. It's broadcast via a netlink multicast address. That
> means we'd have pids and listeners from arbitrary combinations of pid
> namespaces.
> 
Yeah, right now that's a general problem with the netlink approach
compared to the signal approach I was using before.  Of course, it's
also non-obvious how init in the initial pid namespace should deal with
processes dying in a different pid namespace.

> One obvious but poor solution is to only send the pid of the initial
> pid namespace. Then it's not ambiguous what an event refers to. However
> it also means that the events would only be useful to tasks running
> in the initial pid namespace -- not a good solution given Scott's example
> and our desire to run things like sshd in separate pid namespaces.
> 
> Alternatively, we may be able to split up the connector such that the
> listeners only see events from their own pid namespace. I'm not
> sure that netlink and connectors can enable this change though.
> 
Or the netlink socket could include both the pid, and a descriptor of
the pid namespace that it is in (isn't it just a pid itself?)  That way
listeners could check the namespace is the same before carrying on.

Though that obviously leaks information you may not actually want
leaked?

Scott
-- 
Scott James Remnant
scott-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-26 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <E1MGUmL-00036A-EE@zelda.netsplit.com>
     [not found] ` <20090622161909.e5706885.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
     [not found]   ` <20090622161909.e5706885.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-23 21:01     ` [PATCH] proc connector: add event for process becoming session leader Matt Helsley
     [not found]       ` <20090623210110.GB7931-52DBMbEzqgQ/wnmkkaCWp/UQ3DHhIser@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-26 12:38         ` Scott James Remnant [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1246019931.10001.7.camel@quest \
    --to=scott-gewih/nmzzlqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=matthltc-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sukadev-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox