From: Daniel Gollub <dgollub-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
To: Kai Henningsen <kai.extern-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
mtk.manpages-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
ltp-list-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
"A.E. Brouwer" <aeb-ek1Qb6IBo2Pz+pZb47iToQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] [RFC] kernel/glibc mismatch of "readlink" syscall?
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:37:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810311637.25371.dgollub@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081031160248.2b95d0e8-r49W/1Cwd2f9tVrXfjCyDJqJBGhVce5bs0AfqQuZ5sE@public.gmane.org>
On Friday 31 October 2008 16:02:48 Kai Henningsen wrote:
> Am Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:53:25 -0500
>
> schrieb "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Daniel Gollub <dgollub-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > EINVAL bufsiz is not positive.
> >
> > The EINVAL error was added to man-pages-1.18 in 1997 (even though, as
> > you note, the type was "size_t"). I suspect (this was well before I
> > had any association with man-pages) that was done to reflect kernel
> > reality (since one could bypass glibc invoke the syscall directly),
> > but obviously it is inconsistent with the prototype.
>
> Actually, it's not inconsistent as described, though perhaps that is
> unintentional. "Not positive" isn't the same as "negative", as zero
> isn't positive either, and zero is certainly a possible value of an
> unsigned type
True.
But there is still the problem for the ltp syscall test "readlink03", when
using the glibc "readlink" interface, by calling readlink with a buffer size
of "-1".
Calling "-1" seems to be a valid code/error-path in the linux syscall
"readlink", since there is a check for less-equal zero.
But the less zero, condition can't be reached via the glibc "readlink"
interface since this would cause fortify-check to fail (when buliding with -
D_FORITFY_SOURCE=2).
To "workaround" the fortify check, by not compiling the testcase with -
D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2, or trying to test the linux readlink interface by calling
directly syscall() in the testcase ... both suggestion are just workarounds -
no real solutions.
We could also just remove the testcase of buffer size "-1".
The problem is still, how to test the "readlink" syscall in LTP?
best regards,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-31 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-23 14:50 [patch 0/3] [RFC] kernel/glibc mismatch of "readlink" syscall? Daniel Gollub
2008-10-23 14:50 ` [patch 1/3] [RFC] Change sys_readlink/sys_readlinkat buffer size parameter to size_t (POSIX mismatch) Daniel Gollub
2008-10-23 14:50 ` [patch 2/3] [man-pages] Remove "bufsize is not positive" from readlink(2) error section Daniel Gollub
2008-10-23 14:50 ` [patch 3/3] [ltp] Remove testcase for "Buffer size is not positive" in kernel/syscalls/readlink/readlink03 Daniel Gollub
[not found] ` <20081023145054.998439866-MHjlv9skyARbpigZmTR7Iw@public.gmane.org>
2008-10-24 22:53 ` [patch 0/3] [RFC] kernel/glibc mismatch of "readlink" syscall? Michael Kerrisk
[not found] ` <cfd18e0f0810241553x77194611o11655a89871dc210-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-10-28 9:11 ` Andries E. Brouwer
2008-10-31 15:02 ` Kai Henningsen
[not found] ` <20081031160248.2b95d0e8-r49W/1Cwd2f9tVrXfjCyDJqJBGhVce5bs0AfqQuZ5sE@public.gmane.org>
2008-10-31 15:37 ` Daniel Gollub [this message]
[not found] ` <200810311637.25371.dgollub-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2008-11-04 16:20 ` Michael Kerrisk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200810311637.25371.dgollub@suse.de \
--to=dgollub-l3a5bk7wagm@public.gmane.org \
--cc=aeb-ek1Qb6IBo2Pz+pZb47iToQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kai.extern-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ltp-list-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox