From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland McGrath Subject: Re: ptrace(PTRACE_SYSCALL) and data field Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:07:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090330000712.C0B54FC2A8@magilla.sf.frob.com> References: <200903172346.32372.vapier@gentoo.org> <20090329223508.4521DFC2A8@magilla.sf.frob.com> <20090329233402.9C695FC2A8@magilla.sf.frob.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Michael Kerrisk's message of Monday, 30 March 2009 12:54:44 +1300 Sender: linux-man-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Cc: Mike Frysinger , linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org > Hmmm. The existing man page includes this text: > > PTRACE_SYSEMU, PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP (since Linux 2.6.14) > ... > (addr and data are ignored; ... > > which according to what you've said (and also according to my reading > of the source), is wrong. Correct? Yes, those also treat the signal argument like PTRACE_CONT et al. Thanks, Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html