From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ld.so.8: clarify synopsis Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:39:38 -0500 Message-ID: <20111020183938.GC5563@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net> References: <20111020070037.GA11392@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net> <20111020070412.GA11485@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net> <201110201408.34778.vapier@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201110201408.34778.vapier-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-man-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mike Frysinger Cc: linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Petr Baudis , Aurelien Jarno , Reuben Thomas List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 20 October 2011 03:04:12 Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> +.RB \*(lq /lib/ld-linux.so.* >> +.RI [ options ] >> +.I program >> +.RI [ arguments ]\*(rq. > > can we avoid lq/rq ? Sorry about that. I couldn't figure out how to get a literal quotation mark in there, but more to the point, it would have been better to just say something like .B /lib/ld-linux.so.* or .BR /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 . here. So, um, yes we can avoid the nonportable quote mark style, and it even would make the page a little better. I'll reroll once reviewing v1 stops seeming fruitful. > the rest looks fine to me. Thanks for looking it over. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html