From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] ld.so.8: some improvements from Debian Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:24:08 -0500 Message-ID: <20120416172408.GT5813@burratino> References: <20111020070037.GA11392@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net> <20120416165806.GR5813@burratino> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-man-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Cc: linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Petr Baudis , Aurelien Jarno , Reuben Thomas List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > Could you possibly also rearchitect the patch series please, in the > light of the following: > * There have been a (very) few changes to upstream ld.so.8, so you'll > need to rebase. Sure, no problem. > * Please clearly separate out those pieces that simply bridge the gap > between upstream ld.so.8 and Debian ld.so.8 and those pieces that are > your own enhancements. (I did correctly understand that there are some > of those, right?). Do I understand correctly that you want first a patch that makes it look just like Debian's ld.so.8, and after that patches that make it more palatable? That doesn't seem quite right to me --- for example, it would mean first reverting the changes to upstream ld.so.8 and then reapplying them again. Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html