Re: [patch] wait4.2: Add a note that these functions are deprecated

[Adrian Bunk <bunk-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 07:16:28AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> >> >> I think the idea of your patch is good, but I prefer to use a word
> >> >> other than "deprecated". The problem is that "deprecated" implies a
> >> >> standards body or a vendor made a formal statement about this. It's
> >> >> true that LSB 2.1 says that wait3() is deprecated
> >> >> (http://refspecs.linuxbase.org/LSB_2.1.0/LSB-generic/LSB-generic/baselib-wait3-3.html),
> >> >> but wait4() is currently still part of LSB. So, I applied a slightly
> >> >>
> >> >> modified version of your test:
> >> >>
> >> >> [[
> >> >> These functions are nonstandard; use
> >> >>
> >> >> .BR waitpid (2)
> >> >> or
> >> >> .BR waitid (2)
> >> >> in new programs.
> >> >> ]]
> >> >>
> >> >> Seem okay?
> >> >
> >> > the wait3() function is not "nonstandard, since as the URL you gave
> >> > correctly states it is part of SuSv2 (and also of SuSv1).
> >>
> >> Yep, but marked LEGACY in SUSv2, and removed altogether in SUSv3. So,
> >> not part of contemporary standard. (BTW, I did also add text under
> >> CONFORMING TO to note those details.) So, I think I'll leave the text
> >> as I gave already, unless you have a better alternative to propose.
> >
> > My problem is with the word "nonstandard" for wait3(), that was
> > specified in older standards.
> >
> > What about "obsolete" instead?
> 
> Okay -- done!

Thanks!

> Cheers,
> 
> Michael

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html