Re: [PATCH] umount.2: Homogeneous wording, don't recall function name

[Simon Paillard <spaillard-8fiUuRrzOP0dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]

Hi,

On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 12:36:58AM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
> See:
> 	man2/link.2:An invalid flag value was specified in
> 	man2/swapon.2:An invalid flag value was specified in
> 	man2/umount.2:An invalid flag value was specified in
> 	man2/unlink.2:An invalid flag value was specified in

Forget this patch, as umount manpage explains both umount() and umount2(),
hence the need to explicit which function EINVAL details are about. 

> ---
>  man2/umount.2 | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/man2/umount.2 b/man2/umount.2
> index 86fff50..18a87a0 100644
> --- a/man2/umount.2
> +++ b/man2/umount.2
> @@ -137,8 +137,7 @@ or
>  .BR MNT_FORCE .
>  .TP
>  .BR EINVAL " (since Linux 2.6.34)"
> -.BR umount2 ()
> -was called with an invalid flag value in
> +An invalid flag value was specified in
>  .IR flags .
>  .TP
>  .B ENAMETOOLONG
> -- 
> 1.8.5.3

-- 
Simon Paillard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html