From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Wilk Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ptrace.2: tfix Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 14:34:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20161127133403.9319-1-jwilk@jwilk.net> Return-path: Sender: linux-man-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Michael Kerrisk Cc: linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Wilk --- man2/ptrace.2 | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/man2/ptrace.2 b/man2/ptrace.2 index bd76099..0ff73fa 100644 --- a/man2/ptrace.2 +++ b/man2/ptrace.2 @@ -1600,7 +1600,7 @@ Note that all mentions apply equally to .BR PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP. .LP -However, even if the tracee is was continued using +However, even if the tracee was continued using .BR PTRACE_SYSCALL , it is not guaranteed that the next stop will be a syscall-exit-stop. Other possibilities are that the tracee may stop in a @@ -1702,7 +1702,7 @@ always followed by syscall-exit-stop, stop, or the tracee's death; no other kinds of ptrace-stop can occur in between. However, note that seccomp stops (see below) can cause syscall-exit-stops, -without preceeding syscall-entry-stops. +without preceding syscall-entry-stops. If seccomp is in use, care needs to be taken not to misinterpret such stops as syscall-entry-stops. .LP @@ -1781,7 +1781,7 @@ will cause syscall-exit-stops, the system call number may be changed and any other modified registers are visible to the to-be-executed system call as well). Note that there may be, -but need not have been a preceeding syscall-entry-stop. +but need not have been a preceding syscall-entry-stop. After a .BR PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP -- 2.10.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html