From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: Review request: draft ioctl_userfaultfd(2) manual page Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:00:48 +0300 Message-ID: <20170425080047.GA16770@rapoport-lnx> References: <487b2c79-f99b-6d0f-2412-aa75cde65569@gmail.com> <9af29fc6-dce2-f729-0f07-a0bfcc6c3587@gmail.com> <20170322135423.GB27789@rapoport-lnx> <20170421110714.GC20569@rapoport-lnx> <4c05c2bb-af77-d706-9455-8ceaa5510580@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4c05c2bb-af77-d706-9455-8ceaa5510580@gmail.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , lkml , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , linux-man List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Hello Michael, On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 01:41:18PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > Hi Mike, > [...] > > > > Yes. > > Just the future is only a week or two from today as we are at 4.11-rc7 :) > > Yes, I understand :-). So of course there's a *lot* more > new stuff to document, right? I've started to add the description of the new functionality to both userfaultfd.2 and ioctl_userfaultfd.2 and it's somewhat difficult for me to decide how it would be better to split the information between these two pages and what should be the pages internal structure. I even thought about possibility of adding relatively comprehensive description of userfaultfd as man7/userfaultfd.7 and then keeping the pages in man2 relatively small, just with brief description of APIs and SEE ALSO pointing to man7. Any advise is highly appreciated. > [...] -- Sincerely yours, Mike. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org