From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk-manpages
<mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-man <linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky
<schwidefsky-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-s390-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
QingFeng Hao
<haoqf-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [man-pages PATCH 2/5] s390_runtime_instr.2: document the removal of the second argument
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 08:20:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180131072002.GA3939@osiris> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkJduq-h=RdranSq_jbg3g65dKPLa5+P-85kR4Z+nFyfYe0w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 01:16:25PM +0000, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 11:41 AM, Heiko Carstens
> <heiko.carstens-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > If you now document the above people will start using the system call with
> > only one parameter which isn't backwards compatible.
> >
> > I'd rather add the second parameter again to the system call so that code
> > stays backwards compatible.
>
> Well, it ought to be documented somehow, especially if the syscall
> parameter will be added back, as there could be situation where
> application gets successful return code for the call non-zero value of
> the second argument and gets no signals as it is the one of the kernel
> releases where this parameter was removed. I can update the patch to
> reflect this once the patch that returns the second argument reaches
> the kernel tree.
So, I think something like the below should be ok:
>From 6c7e2113c62fbb95662fba03f7fa298f4b737c1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 08:15:31 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] s390_runtime_instr.2: document signum argument behavior
change
Document that the signum argument is ignored in newer kernels, but
that user space should pass a valid real-time signal number for
backwards compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
man2/s390_runtime_instr.2 | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man2/s390_runtime_instr.2 b/man2/s390_runtime_instr.2
index 18c2c0763eed..d5790e10f222 100644
--- a/man2/s390_runtime_instr.2
+++ b/man2/s390_runtime_instr.2
@@ -47,10 +47,9 @@ argument controls whether run-time instrumentation is started
.PP
The
.IR signum
-argument specifies the number of a real-time signal.
-The real-time signal is sent to the thread if the run-time instrumentation
-buffer is full or if the run-time-instrumentation-halted interrupt
-occurred.
+argument specifies the number of a real-time signal. This argument has no
+effect, since support for signalling was never used and kernel support was
+removed.
.SH RETURN VALUE
On success,
.BR s390_runtime_instr ()
@@ -67,9 +66,16 @@ is set to one of the error codes listed below.
.B EINVAL
The value specified in
.IR command
-is not a valid command or the value specified in
+is not a valid command.
+.TP
+.B EINVAL
+The value specified in
.IR signum
-is not a real-time signal number.
+is not a real-time signal number. With Linux 4.4 and newer kernel versions,
+the
+.IR signum
+argument has no effect, so that an invalid signal number will not result in an
+error.
.TP
.B ENOMEM
Allocating memory for the run-time instrumentation control block failed.
@@ -85,6 +91,12 @@ The run-time instrumentation facility is available beginning with System z EC12.
Glibc does not provide a wrapper for this system call, use
.BR syscall (2)
to call it.
+.PP
+Support for signalling was removed with Linux 4.4. With Linux 4.4
+also the check if
+.IR signum
+is a valid real-time signal was removed. For backwards compatibility with old
+kernels it is recommended to pass a valid real-time signal number.
.SH SEE ALSO
.BR syscall (2),
.BR signal (7)
--
2.13.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-31 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-14 18:56 [man-pages PATCH 2/5] s390_runtime_instr.2: document the removal of the second argument Eugene Syromyatnikov
[not found] ` <20180114185627.GA23602-ZbobWygYI+YXGNroddHbYwC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2018-01-20 11:41 ` Heiko Carstens
2018-01-22 13:16 ` Eugene Syromyatnikov
[not found] ` <CACGkJduq-h=RdranSq_jbg3g65dKPLa5+P-85kR4Z+nFyfYe0w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-01-31 7:20 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2018-01-31 8:41 ` Eugene Syromyatnikov
[not found] ` <CACGkJdsbrR2uwK0P1PaXC9YTKaXV0w-1jD1fu4vBrz5dFHMbLA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-01-31 9:21 ` Heiko Carstens
2018-01-31 9:29 ` Eugene Syromyatnikov
2018-01-31 9:33 ` Eugene Syromyatnikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180131072002.GA3939@osiris \
--to=heiko.carstens-ta70fqpds9bqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=evgsyr-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=haoqf-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-s390-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=schwidefsky-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox