From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, corbet@lwn.net, bagasdotme@gmail.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, yang.zhong@intel.com,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-man@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chang.seok.bae@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/4] Documentation/x86: Explain the state component permission for guests
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 13:15:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220909201540.17705-5-chang.seok.bae@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220909201540.17705-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Commit 980fe2fddcff ("x86/fpu: Extend fpu_xstate_prctl() with guest
permissions") extends a couple of arch_prctl(2) options for VCPU threads.
Add description for them.
Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
---
Changes from v1:
* Add the reason for the guest options (Dave Hansen).
* Add a note to allude some VMM policy, i.e. KVM_X86_XCOMP_GUEST_SUPP.
* Move it in the separate section.
Note the correspondent attributes were also proposed for the KVM API. But,
it was seen as inessential:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220823231402.7839-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com/
---
Documentation/x86/xstate.rst | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/x86/xstate.rst b/Documentation/x86/xstate.rst
index f7aad2241d32..fd7b5333bd70 100644
--- a/Documentation/x86/xstate.rst
+++ b/Documentation/x86/xstate.rst
@@ -141,3 +141,32 @@ entry if the feature is in its initial configuration. This differs from
non-dynamic features which are always written regardless of their
configuration. Signal handlers can examine the XSAVE buffer's XSTATE_BV
field to determine if a features was written.
+
+Dynamic features for virtual machines
+-------------------------------------
+
+The permission for the guest state component needs to be managed separately
+from the host, as they are exclusive to each other. A coupled of options
+are extended to control the guest permission:
+
+-ARCH_GET_XCOMP_GUEST_PERM
+
+ arch_prctl(ARCH_GET_XCOMP_GUEST_PERM, &features);
+
+ ARCH_GET_XCOMP_GUEST_PERM is a variant of ARCH_GET_XCOMP_PERM. So it
+ provides the same semantics and functionality but for the guest
+ components.
+
+-ARCH_REQ_XCOMP_GUEST_PERM
+
+ arch_prctl(ARCH_REQ_XCOMP_GUEST_PERM, feature_nr);
+
+ ARCH_REQ_XCOMP_GUEST_PERM is a variant of ARCH_REQ_XCOMP_PERM. It has the
+ same semantics for the guest permission. While providing a similiar
+ functionality, this comes with a constraint. Permission is frozen when the
+ first VCPU is created. Any attempt to change permission after that point
+ is going to be rejected. So, the permission has to be requested before the
+ first VCPU creation.
+
+Note that some VMMs may have already established a set of supported state
+components. These options are not presumed to support any particular VMM.
--
2.17.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-09 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-09 20:15 [PATCH v4 0/4] Documentation/x86: Improve the AMX documentation Chang S. Bae
2022-09-09 20:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] Documentation/x86: Explain the purpose for dynamic features Chang S. Bae
2022-09-09 21:36 ` Dave Hansen
2022-09-14 5:25 ` Chang S. Bae
2022-09-09 20:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] x86/arch_prctl: Add AMX feature numbers as ABI constants Chang S. Bae
2022-09-09 20:15 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] Documentation/x86: Add the AMX enabling example Chang S. Bae
2022-09-09 20:15 ` Chang S. Bae [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220909201540.17705-5-chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yang.zhong@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox