Re: [PATCH v2] clone.2: Fix outdated statement about CLONE_NEWPID

Alejandro Colomar
2023-08-13T13:40:50Z

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 684 bytes --]

Hi Serge,

On 2023-08-13 15:35, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
[...]

>
> Well no, I don't think that's right. That implies that the
> CLONE_PARENT check was a long standing one. In fact, the
> point was that it was a regression introduced in
>
> 40a0d32d1 (Wed Sep 11 14:19:41 2013 -0700)
>
> and then fixed in 1f7f4dde5 two months later.

Thanks! I'll rewrite the commit accordingly (more like Sargun's v1)
and include this info.

Cheers,
Alex

>
>> +either.
>> .TP
>> .B CLONE_NEWUSER
>> (This flag first became meaningful for
>> --
>> 2.40.1

--
<http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
GPG key fingerprint: A9348594CE31283A826FBDD8D57633D441E25BB5

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]