Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] readv.2: Document RWF_ATOMIC flag

Darrick J. Wong
2024-07-18T15:05:17Z

On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 03:07:59PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 17/07/2024 22:44, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 09:36:18AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> > > From: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com>
> > >
> > > Add RWF_ATOMIC flag description for pwritev2().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com>
> > > [jpg: complete rewrite]
> > > Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > > man/man2/readv.2 | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/man/man2/readv.2 b/man/man2/readv.2
> > > index eecde06dc..9c8a11324 100644
> > > --- a/man/man2/readv.2
> > > +++ b/man/man2/readv.2
> > > @@ -193,6 +193,66 @@ which provides lower latency, but may use additional resources.
> > > .B O_DIRECT
> > > flag.)
> > > .TP
> > > +.BR RWF_ATOMIC " (since Linux 6.11)"
> > > +Requires that writes to regular files in block-based filesystems be issued with
> > > +torn-write protection.
> > > +Torn-write protection means that for a power or any other hardware failure,
> > > +all or none of the data from the write will be stored,
> > > +but never a mix of old and new data.
> > > +This flag is meaningful only for
> > > +.BR pwritev2 (),
> > > +and its effect applies only to the data range written by the system call.
> > > +The total write length must be power-of-2 and must be sized in the range
> > > +.RI [ stx_atomic_write_unit_min ,
> > > +.IR stx_atomic_write_unit_max ].
> > > +The write must be at a naturally-aligned offset within the file with respect to
> > > +the total write length -
> > > +for example,
> >
> > Nit: these could be two sentences
> >
> > "The write must be at a naturally-aligned offset within the file with
> > respect to the total write length. For example, ..."
>
> ok, sure
>
> >
> > > +a write of length 32KB at a file offset of 32KB is permitted,
> > > +however a write of length 32KB at a file offset of 48KB is not permitted.
> >
> > Pickier nit: KiB, not KB.
>
> ok
>
> >
> > > +The upper limit of
> > > +.I iovcnt
> > > +for
> > > +.BR pwritev2 ()
> > > +is in
> >
> > "is given by" ?
>
> ok, fine, I don't mind
>
> >
> > > +.I stx_atomic_write_segments_max.
> > > +Torn-write protection only works with
> > > +.B O_DIRECT
> > > +flag, i.e. buffered writes are not supported.
> > > +To guarantee consistency from the write between a file's in-core state with the
> > > +storage device,
> > > +.BR fdatasync (2),
> > > +or
> > > +.BR fsync (2),
> > > +or
> > > +.BR open (2)
> > > +and either
> > > +.B O_SYNC
> > > +or
> > > +.B O_DSYNC,
> > > +or
> > > +.B pwritev2 ()
> > > +and either
> > > +.B RWF_SYNC
> > > +or
> > > +.B RWF_DSYNC
> > > +is required. Flags
> >
> > This sentence ^^ should start on a new line.
>
> yes
>
> >
> > > +.B O_SYNC
> > > +or
> > > +.B RWF_SYNC
> > > +provide the strongest guarantees for
> > > +.BR RWF_ATOMIC,
> > > +in that all data and also file metadata updates will be persisted for a
> > > +successfully completed write.
> > > +Just using either flags
> > > +.B O_DSYNC
> > > +or
> > > +.B RWF_DSYNC
> > > +means that all data and any file updates will be persisted for a successfully
> > > +completed write.
> >
>
> ughh, this is hard to word both concisely and accurately...
>
> > "any file updates" ? I /think/ the difference between O_SYNC and
> > O_DSYNC is that O_DSYNC persists all data and file metadata updates for
> > the file range that was written, whereas O_SYNC persists all data and
> > file metadata updates for the entire file.
>
> I think that https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/open.2.html#NOTES
> describes it best.
>
> >
> > Perhaps everything between "Flags O_SYNC or RWF_SYNC..." and "...for a
> > successfully completed write." should instead refer readers to the notes
> > about synchronized I/O flags in the openat manpage?
>
> Maybe that would be better, but we just need to make it clear that
> RWF_ATOMIC provides the guarantee that the data is atomically updated only
> in addition to whatever guarantee we have for metadata updates from
> O_SYNC/O_DSYNC.
>
>
> So maybe:
> RWF_ATOMIC provides the guarantee that any data is written with torn-write
> protection, and additional flags O_SYNC or O_DSYNC provide
> same Synchronized I/O guarantees as documented in <openat manpage reference>

^ the same

>
> OK?

Yes.

> > > +Not using any sync flags means that there is no guarantee that data or
> > > +filesystem updates are persisted.
> > > +.TP
> > > .BR RWF_SYNC " (since Linux 4.7)"
> > > .\" commit e864f39569f4092c2b2bc72c773b6e486c7e3bd9
> > > Provide a per-write equivalent of the
> > > @@ -279,10 +339,26 @@ values overflows an
> > > .I ssize_t
> > > value.
> > > .TP
> > > +.B EINVAL
> > > + For
> > > +.BR RWF_ATOMIC
> > > +set,
> >
> > "If RWF_ATOMIC is specified..." ?
> >
> > (to be a bit more consistent with the language around the AT_* flags in
> > openat)
>
> ok, fine
>
> >
> > > +the combination of the sum of the
> > > +.I iov_len
> > > +values and the
> > > +.I offset
> > > +value does not comply with the length and offset torn-write protection rules.
> > > +.TP
> > > .B EINVAL
> > > The vector count,
> > > .IR iovcnt ,
> > > is less than zero or greater than the permitted maximum.
> > > +For
> > > +.BR RWF_ATOMIC
> > > +set, this maximum is in
> >
> > (same)
> >
> > --D
> >
>
> Thanks for checking,

NP. :)

--D

> John
>
>