public inbox for linux-man@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>
To: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Subject: the correct way to say "POSIX 2024"
Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 16:43:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250517214356.cpueutlfgi6t2enl@illithid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dfcy75vkqhlitfddrvbtaufcir3mour2g6cczxstpp32fhkedn@wj7k34u2rk6l>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 729 bytes --]

Hi Alex,

At 2025-05-17T23:16:20+0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 01:53:02PM -0700, Collin Funk wrote:
> > +"P2024" indicates that the signal was added or its definition changed in
> > +POSIX 2024.
> 
> This should be "POSIX.1-2024", not "POSIX 2024".

Do you have a supporting reference for this?  I thought that since the
POSIX standard was no longer organized into subdivisions in the way it
was historically (with POSIX.1, POSIX.2, POSIX.4a, and so on), that
"POSIX.1-2004" was something of a misnomer.

I checked <https://www.opengroup.org/austin/>, but that page seems
careful not to use _either_ formulation!  (It instead refers only to
IEEE Std 1003.1-2024.)

Regards,
Branden

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-17 21:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-17 20:53 [PATCH 1/3] man/man7/signal.7: Mention SIGWINCH was standardized in POSIX-1.2024 Collin Funk
2025-05-17 20:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] man/man3/getenv.3: Mention secure_getenv " Collin Funk
2025-05-17 21:17   ` Alejandro Colomar
2025-05-17 21:25     ` Collin Funk
2025-05-17 21:34       ` Alejandro Colomar
2025-05-17 22:19         ` Collin Funk
2025-05-18  7:58           ` Alejandro Colomar
2025-05-23  3:18             ` Collin Funk
2025-05-23 10:07               ` Alejandro Colomar
2025-05-23 21:22                 ` Collin Funk
2025-05-24 17:46                   ` Alejandro Colomar
2025-05-17 20:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] man/man3/ptsname.3: Mention ptsname_r " Collin Funk
2025-05-17 21:20   ` Alejandro Colomar
2025-05-17 21:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] man/man7/signal.7: Mention SIGWINCH " Alejandro Colomar
2025-05-17 21:43   ` G. Branden Robinson [this message]
2025-05-17 22:40     ` the correct way to say "POSIX 2024" Mark Harris
2025-05-17 22:45       ` G. Branden Robinson
2025-05-18  7:12     ` Alejandro Colomar
2025-05-18  7:52       ` Alejandro Colomar
2025-05-17 22:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] man/man7/signal.7: Mention SIGWINCH was standardized in POSIX-1.2024 Collin Funk
2025-05-17 22:10   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] man/man3/getenv.3: Mention secure_getenv " Collin Funk
2025-05-18  8:02     ` Alejandro Colomar
2025-05-18  8:00   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] man/man7/signal.7: Mention SIGWINCH " Alejandro Colomar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250517214356.cpueutlfgi6t2enl@illithid \
    --to=g.branden.robinson@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox