From: Simon Essien <champbreed1@gmail.com>
To: alx@kernel.org
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org, Simon Essien <champbreed1@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] seccomp_unotify.2: confirm listener limits and signal behavior
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 13:49:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260106134936.233305-2-champbreed1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260106134936.233305-1-champbreed1@gmail.com>
- Remove FIXME regarding the single-listener limit. Verification
via test program confirms the kernel returns EBUSY as documented.
- Remove FIXME regarding SA_RESTART oddity. The behavior is
established and documented; the internal query is no longer required.
---
man/man2/seccomp_unotify.2 | 12 ------------
1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/man2/seccomp_unotify.2 b/man/man2/seccomp_unotify.2
index b3aedad4b..f1ff13513 100644
--- a/man/man2/seccomp_unotify.2
+++ b/man/man2/seccomp_unotify.2
@@ -89,8 +89,6 @@ Consequently, the return value of the (successful)
call is a new "listening"
file descriptor that can be used to receive notifications.
Only one "listening" seccomp filter can be installed for a thread.
-.\" FIXME
-.\" Is the last sentence above correct?
.\"
.\" Kees Cook (25 Oct 2020) notes:
.\"
@@ -1148,16 +1146,6 @@ that would
normally be restarted by the
.B SA_RESTART
flag.
-.\" FIXME
-.\" About the above, Kees Cook commented:
-.\"
-.\" Does this need fixing? I imagine the correct behavior for this case
-.\" would be a response to _SEND of EINPROGRESS and the target would see
-.\" EINTR normally?
-.\"
-.\" I mean, it's not like seccomp doesn't already expose weirdness with
-.\" syscall restarts. Not even arm64 compat agrees[3] with arm32 in this
-.\" regard. :(
.
.\" FIXME
.\" Michael Kerrisk:
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-06 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-06 13:49 [PATCH 1/3] man3/creal.3, man3/cimag.3: Standardize style and history Simon Essien
2026-01-06 13:49 ` Simon Essien [this message]
2026-01-06 13:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] man2: update glibc wrapper status and clean up FIXMEs Simon Essien
2026-01-06 13:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] netlink.7: expand NETLINK_NETFILTER and clarify NLM_F_ATOMIC status Simon Essien
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260106134936.233305-2-champbreed1@gmail.com \
--to=champbreed1@gmail.com \
--cc=alx@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox