From: Matthieu Buffet <matthieu@buffet.re>
To: "Alejandro Colomar" <alx@kernel.org>, "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
Cc: "Günther Noack" <gnoack3000@gmail.com>,
linux-man@vger.kernel.org, "Matthieu Buffet" <matthieu@buffet.re>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] man/man7/landlock.7, man/man2/landlock_add_rule.2: Document UDP support
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 09:58:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260917075853.10231-4-matthieu@buffet.re> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917075853.10231-1-matthieu@buffet.re>
Landlock support for UDP-specific policy was merged in 7.2 in
linux.git 9a8ed15ce224 ("landlock: Add UDP bind() access control")
and
linux.git e61247a2e694 ("landlock: Add UDP send+connect access control")
Update the example to account for ABI v10, and add documentation for new
access rights taken from the UAPI header, plus:
- explicitly state in the access right description that sending
datagrams without a destination does not require any access right
- more importantly: clarify the description of the most non-trivial
behaviour (auto-bind denials when emitting, which can occur even if
CONNECT_SEND_UDP is not handled)
Link: <https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/66>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Buffet <matthieu@buffet.re>
---
man/man2/landlock_add_rule.2 | 15 +++++---
man/man7/landlock.7 | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/man2/landlock_add_rule.2 b/man/man2/landlock_add_rule.2
index 633d89824373..2b2b28147de0 100644
--- a/man/man2/landlock_add_rule.2
+++ b/man/man2/landlock_add_rule.2
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ just a file.
.TP
.BR LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT " (since Landlock ABI version 4)"
For these rules,
-the object is a TCP port,
+the object is a TCP or UDP port,
and the related actions are defined with
.IR "network access rights" .
.IP
@@ -120,8 +120,14 @@ with
A Landlock rule with port 0
and the
.B LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP
-right means that requesting to bind on port 0 is allowed
-and it will automatically translate to binding on the related port range.
+or
+.B LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP
+right means that requesting to bind on port 0
+(explicitly, or implicitly
+by e.g.\& sending a datagram on an unbound UDP socket)
+is allowed
+and it will automatically translate to
+binding on a kernel-assigned ephemeral port.
.P
.I flags
must be 0.
@@ -141,7 +147,8 @@ can fail for the following reasons:
.I rule_type
is
.BR LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT ,
-but TCP is not supported by the running kernel.
+but the kernel was built without
+.BR CONFIG_INET .
.TP
.B EBADF
.I ruleset_fd
diff --git a/man/man7/landlock.7 b/man/man7/landlock.7
index 51e63f40052c..884e1d49feb0 100644
--- a/man/man7/landlock.7
+++ b/man/man7/landlock.7
@@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ For these rules, the object is a file hierarchy,
and the related filesystem actions are defined with
.IR "filesystem access rights" .
.TP
-.BR "Network rules" " (since ABI v4)"
-For these rules, the object is a TCP port,
+.BR "Network rules" " (since ABI v4 for TCP, v10 for UDP)"
+For these rules, the object is a TCP or UDP port,
and the related actions are defined with
.IR "network access rights" .
.\"
@@ -277,6 +277,55 @@ Bind a TCP socket to a local port.
.BR LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP " (since Landlock ABI version 4)"
Connect an active TCP socket to a remote port.
.P
+And similarly for UDP port numbers:
+.TP
+.BR LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP " (since Landlock ABI version 10)"
+Bind a UDP socket to the given local port.
+.TP
+.BR LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP " (since Landlock ABI version 10)"
+Set the remote port of a UDP socket to the given port,
+or send datagrams to the given remote port
+taking precedence over any destination pre-set on a socket.
+Sending without an explicit destination
+(i.e.\& on a socket already connected)
+is never restricted.
+.P
+Note on auto-binding:
+Setting a remote address
+or sending a first datagram
+on UDP sockets
+performs an implicit
+.BR bind (2)
+to an ephemeral local source port
+if not already bound.
+If
+.B LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP
+is handled,
+to avoid an
+.B EACCES
+error when sending outbound datagrams
+(even if
+.B LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP
+is not handled),
+either:
+.IP \[bu] 3
+use a socket already bound to a port
+before the ruleset started being enforced;
+.IP \[bu] 3
+grant
+.B LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP
+on port 0, meaning
+\[lq]any port in the ephemeral port range\[rq];
+.IP \[bu] 3
+grant
+.B LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP
+on a specific port,
+and call
+.BR bind (2)
+on that port before trying to
+.BR connect (2)
+or send datagrams.
+.P
Note on
.BR AF_UNSPEC :
Calling
@@ -292,6 +341,17 @@ for IPv4 and
.B INADDR_ANY
it is treated as
.BR AF_INET .
+Sending datagrams to that address family
+on IPv4 UDP sockets
+will similarly be treated as
+.BR AF_INET .
+On IPv6 UDP sockets,
+such use is not supported
+and will always result in a denial as if the policy rejected it:
+use a
+.I NULL
+address instead to get the same semantics
+inside and outside a Landlock domain.
All other uses of that address family result in the same error codes
as when Landlock is not in use.
.\"
@@ -518,6 +578,9 @@ _ _ _
8 7.0 LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC
_ _ _
9 7.1 LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_RESOLVE_UNIX
+_ _ _
+10 7.2 LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP
+\^ \^ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP
.TE
.P
Users should use the Landlock ABI version rather than the kernel version
@@ -628,6 +691,7 @@ __u64 landlock_fs_access_rights[] = {
(LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV << 1) \- 1, // v7: same
(LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV << 1) \- 1, // v8: same
(LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_RESOLVE_UNIX << 1) \- 1, // v9: add "resolve_unix"
+ (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_RESOLVE_UNIX << 1) \- 1, // v10: UDP support
};
\&
int abi = landlock_create_ruleset(NULL, 0,
@@ -640,7 +704,7 @@ if (abi == \-1) {
perror("Unable to use Landlock");
return; /* Graceful fallback: Do nothing. */
}
-abi = MIN(abi, 9);
+abi = MIN(abi, 10);
\&
/* Only use the available rights in the ruleset. */
attr.handled_access_fs &= landlock_fs_access_rights[abi \- 1];
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 7:58 [PATCH 0/3] Add Landlock UDP support documentation Matthieu Buffet
2026-09-17 7:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] man/man2/landlock_add_rule.2: Clarify ephemeral port range Matthieu Buffet
2026-09-26 10:00 ` Günther Noack
2026-09-29 19:02 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-09-17 7:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] man/man7/landlock.7: Document AF_UNSPEC behaviour and error codes Matthieu Buffet
2026-09-26 10:13 ` Günther Noack
2026-09-17 7:58 ` Matthieu Buffet [this message]
2026-09-26 14:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] man/man7/landlock.7, man/man2/landlock_add_rule.2: Document UDP support Günther Noack
2026-09-29 19:03 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-09-29 19:02 ` [PATCH 0/3] Add Landlock UDP support documentation Mickaël Salaün
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260917075853.10231-4-matthieu@buffet.re \
--to=matthieu@buffet.re \
--cc=alx@kernel.org \
--cc=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox