public inbox for linux-man@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)" <alx.manpages@gmail.com>
To: "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>
Cc: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>,
	linux-man@vger.kernel.org,
	"Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] termios.3: SPARC architecture has 4 different Bnnn constants
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 00:17:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d3423d2-43b6-1d32-425f-24fb7e050617@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210804061425.yde647cvq3wy4stw@localhost.localdomain>

Hi, Branden!

On 8/4/21 8:14 AM, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Hi, Alex!
> 
> At 2021-08-01T14:13:39+0200, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
>> On 8/1/21 1:22 PM, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
>> When I saw the patch, I had no idea what those .ft/.fi things do, and
>> guessed that they're correct based on existing context.  I think your
>> replacement suggestion below is better.
> 
> The 'ft' request changes the font (or style), and accepts exactly the
> same parameter as the \f font (style) escape.
> 
> The 'fi' request enables filling; 'nf' disables it.
> 
>>> Here's how I'd do that:
>>>
>>> .P
>>> On the SPARC architecture,
>>> the following additional constants are supported.
>>> .RS
>>> .TP
>>> .B B76800
>>> .TQ
>>> .B B153600
>>> .TQ
>>> .B B307200
>>> .TQ
>>> .B  B614400
>>> .RE
>>>
>>> Why would I do it this way?  I'm trying to keep the size of the
>>> language we ask man page writers to learn as small as possible, and
>>> I especially try to keep the number of *roff requests they have to
>>> know as close to zero as possible.  There are already two ways to
>>> change fonts: through macros and escape sequences.  Personally, I'd
>>> like to protect casual man page writers from having to learn the
>>> third.  (And, again, outside of tbl(1) tables, I'd prefer they not
>>> have to know the second [escapes].)
>>
>> Can you please send a more detailed email about what the current
>> implementation does and how compatible is the solution and any
>> differences there may be (if any)?
> 
> Sure, I'll mark 'em up like assembly.  I hope your mail reader uses a
> monospaced/fixed-width font.
> 
> .fi			\" enable filling[1] of text
> .PP			\" man(7) paragraphing macro; see groff_man(7)
> On SPARC architecture	\" text line
> .PP			\" man(7) paragraphing macro; see groff_man(7)
> .nf			\" disable filling of text
> .ft B			\" change font to style "B"
> 	B76800		\" text line using literal tab
> 	B153600		\" ditto
> 	B307200		\" ditto
> 	B614400		\" ditto
> .ft P			\" change font to "previous" selection
> .fi			\" enable filling[1] of text
> 
> Here's how I define filling in the groff Texinfo manual; many other
> sources define it equivalently.
> 
>      GNU 'troff' reads its input character by character, collecting words
>   as it goes, and fits as many words together on an output line as it
>   can--this is known as "filling".  To GNU 'troff', a "word" is any
>   sequence of one or more characters that aren't spaces, tabs, or
>   newlines.  Words are separated by spaces, tabs, newlines, or file
>   boundaries.(2)  (*note Filling-Footnote-2::) To disable filling, see
>   *note Manipulating Filling and Adjustment::.
> 
> I try to avoid use of tab characters in man page sources, except to
> separate columns in tbl(1) input.  I prefer to use the relative inset
> feature (.RS/.RE) because the default size of a relative inset is a
> configurable parameter.  (And if must be a certain value, it can be set
> as the argument to the RS macro.)
> 
> .P			\" man(7) paragraphing macro; see groff_man(7)
> On the SPARC[...]
> the following[...]
> .RS			\" begin relative inset
> .TP			\" begin tagged paragraph
> .B B76800		\" set argument in bold style
> .TQ			\" declare additional paragraph tag
> .B B153600		\" [repeat previous two lines]
> .TQ			\"
> .B B307200		\"
> .TQ			\"
> .B  B614400		\"
> .RE			\" end relative inset.

Yes, I prefer this way.

I'm sorry I forgot to answer to this email.  There may be others also...
If I forgot to address anything important, feel free to ping me :)

Cheers,

Alex

> 
> .RS and .RE are used with timidity by man page authors; I think it is
> because they are ill-understood.  It is certainly not because they are
> new; like .B and .TP they date back to the original 1979 man(7)
> implementation.  Even .P is "new", dating to Unix System III in 1980.
> .TQ is the real newcomer, introduced to groff in January 2007.  Like
> .TP, it's somewhat semantic.
> 
>> I'd like to be able to fix that.
> 
> Let me know if I can shed more light on things.
> 
> Regards,
> Branden
> 


-- 
Alejandro Colomar
Linux man-pages comaintainer; https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-10 22:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-31 14:55 [PATCH] termios.3: SPARC architecture has 4 different Bnnn constants Pali Rohár
2021-08-01 10:55 ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
2021-08-01 11:22 ` G. Branden Robinson
2021-08-01 12:13   ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
2021-08-04  6:14     ` G. Branden Robinson
2021-09-10 22:17       ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) [this message]
2021-08-01 11:35 ` [PATCH v2] " Pali Rohár
2021-08-01 12:16   ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2d3423d2-43b6-1d32-425f-24fb7e050617@gmail.com \
    --to=alx.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=g.branden.robinson@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=pali@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox