public inbox for linux-man@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)" <alx.manpages@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@jwilk.net>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	linux-man@vger.kernel.org, NGINX Unit <unit@nginx.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uri.7: The term URL is deprecated, in favor of URI
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 18:23:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <36b89bec-1def-e87c-5477-c87f2f0e48e9@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220328221557.njqx4jtbvrgv44lc@jwilk.net>

Hi Jakub!

On 3/29/22 00:15, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@gmail.com>, 2022-03-28, 20:27:
>> See RFCs 4395 (obsoleted by 7595) and 7595.
>>
>> So, since URI and URL have been used as synonims
> 
> s/synonim/synonym/ (here and elsewhere)

Oops.  I always doubt when writing words with two y/i in them.
I should run
	dict -m synonim
or
	echo synonim synonym | spell
before typing! :)

> 
>> the RFCs seem to have explicitly avoided URL, and now use URI as the
>> only term, which still means what it meant (so now URL is just a
>> synonim for URI).
> 
> No, as far as RFCs are concerned, URLs are a proper subset of URIs; they
> are not synonyms.

Hmmm, now I've read a few more RFCs, and it seems you're right.

> 
>> This commit replaces (almost all) occurences of URL by URI, except
>> when it is referring to the old term itself.  Keep some legacy info
>> just for readers to understand this.
> 
> I'm not sure this is a step in the right direction. As a data point, in
> contrast to IETF, WHATWG standardized on the term "URL":
> https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#goals

As you say, it's not.  I'm now more confused than I was before, so I
will revert this change.

If you feel like you could update the page, since you seem to know more
than me in this regard, that would be great.

Thanks for the review!


Alex


-- 
Alejandro Colomar
Linux man-pages comaintainer; https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-29 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-28 18:27 [PATCH] uri.7: The term URL is deprecated, in favor of URI Alejandro Colomar
2022-03-28 22:15 ` Jakub Wilk
2022-03-29 16:23   ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) [this message]
2022-04-09  8:41     ` Jakub Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=36b89bec-1def-e87c-5477-c87f2f0e48e9@gmail.com \
    --to=alx.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=jwilk@jwilk.net \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=unit@nginx.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox