Re: A less presumptive .info? (was: Re: Playground pager lsp(1))

Gavin Smith
2023-04-06T08:56:46Z

On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 11:14:01AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > The alternative is, of course, bringing HTML up to par feature-wise
> > (wrt. indices etc), but that'd be on the other end of the extreme, where
> > instead of being too easy to parse and lacking important information,
> > it'd be oververbose with and difficult to parse (not that such a thing
> > should not be done too, so that folks using ordinary browsers can enjoy
> > documentation, and so that projects can provide more accessible
> > documentation by the merit of more people having HTML than Info
> > viewers).
> >
> > WDYT folks?
>
> Gavin will tell, but AFAIU our plan is to develop js as the means
> towards the goals you mentioned. That will allow using HTML browsers
> to read Texinfo documentation without losing the functionalities of
> the Info readers we value. HTML rendering reflows as integral part of
> its workings, so that problem is not an issue if this plan succeeds.

Progress on this issue is described in the TODO.HTML file in the Texinfo
repository.

https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/texinfo.git/tree/TODO.HTML

In short, the main avenue of progress appears to be the documentation
browser using the embedded WebkitGTK browser.