From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Kerrisk Subject: Re: [PATCH] Epoll documentation Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:13:19 +0100 Message-ID: <47C42C8F.7000504@gmail.com> References: <1203689065.3021.79.camel@linux.heathens.co.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-man-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Davide Libenzi Cc: Chris ? Heath , linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Michael Kerrisk wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Davide Libenzi wrote: >> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Chris "=E3~B=AF" Heath wrote: >> >>> A few months ago, Davide Libenzi wrote this message on lkml: >>> http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D119368443105320&w=3D2 >>> but apparently hasn't found time yet to review the man page. >>> >>> So I figured it might work better if I propose a patch and get Davi= de to >>> ack it or suggest further changes. My proposed patch to epoll(7) i= s >>> below. >>> >>> Feedback would be appreciated. In particular, I removed reference = to >>> threads in A1 because I was unable to find a test case where I didn= 't >>> get EEXIST. Maybe I'm missing something. >> I already sent a patch for that to Michael Kerrisk, short after I po= sted >> that message. >=20 > That; true. It's in my queue! Davide, Actually, that was not completely true, as far as I can tell. You sent= me a patch for Q6/A6 (which I finally responded to just now), but I can't = find any patch for Q1/A1... I'll follow up in the other thread, and CC linux-man and Chris. Cheers, Michael --=20 Michael Kerrisk Maintainer of the Linux man-pages project http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Want to report a man-pages bug? Look here: http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html