From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfork.2: wfix Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 11:00:55 +0200 Message-ID: <48c594a2-9a8e-5c75-01bf-a3a80f642a55@gmail.com> References: <20160926153507.16627-1-wfp5p@worldbroken.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160926153507.16627-1-wfp5p-rupya+Y+cgAvmQRmTv5wTA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-man-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Bill Pemberton Cc: mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Hi Bill, Please re-read the original text. It ("that that") is okay, I believe. Cheers, Michael On 09/26/2016 05:35 PM, Bill Pemberton wrote: > Signed-off-by: Bill Pemberton > --- > man2/vfork.2 | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/man2/vfork.2 b/man2/vfork.2 > index 6f20900df4ae..ce03bcd67541 100644 > --- a/man2/vfork.2 > +++ b/man2/vfork.2 > @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ can't be implemented on such systems. > .BR vfork () > from the standard; the POSIX rationale for the > .BR posix_spawn (3) > -function notes that that function, > +function notes that the function, > which provides functionality equivalent to > .BR fork (2)+ exec (3), > is designed to be implementable on systems that lack an MMU.) > -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html