Re: Format inline code

[Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com>]

On 11/13/20 10:00 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
[...]
> But in the "-branden" version I see
> 
> [[
> .RS 6n
> ]]
> 
> If I understand correctly, then that number is calculated based on the
> ".IP * 2" that precedes it. That doesn't seem good (since, maybe at 
> some point, one might want to change the .IP yo say ".IP  1) 3",
> and then one has to fix the .RS lines. Am I missing something?

Hi Branden,

I agree with Michael:
The number by which we indent the code should be 4 always,
and the code needed for that
should be independent of surrounding code.
.RS 6 is 2 + 4 because you're adding the 2 of the .IP.
I don't like it.

I think there's no consistent solution using .RS.

Thanks,

Alex